82 ITR 363 (SC); Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT

93 Taxmann 502Supreme Court of India1997#1572 most cited

What is 82 ITR 363 (SC); Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT authority for?

Interest income earned by an assessee during the period when its business has not commenced, even from funds meant for capital expenditure, is revenue in nature and is assessable under the head 'income from other sources'. The nature of the income, rather than the source of the funds generating it, determines its taxability.

72

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT · 82 ITR 363 · 93 Taxmann 502 · interest income taxability · income from other sources · Section 56 · capital work in progress interest · pre-commencement business income · revenue vs capital receipt · fixed deposit interest

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 82 ITR 363 (SC); Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT

Synthes Medical P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. ACIT Ltu-1, Mumbai

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1784/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Apr 2018AY 2011-12
For Appellant: S/Shri M.P. Lohia/Pranay GandhiFor Respondent: S/Shri V. Jenardhanan /V.Jayant Kumar-CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 254(1)

…ITA/1784/Mum/2016; I.T.A./1857/Mum/2016 & C.O. No.160/Mum/2016 (11-12) Synthes Medical Private Limited (merged with Johnson & Johnson Pvt.Ltd.) आयकर आयकर अपीलीय आयकर आयकर अपीलीय अपीलीय अिधकरण अपीलीय अिधकरण अिधकरण, मुंबई अिधकरण मुंबई मुंबई “ केकेकेके” खंडपीठ मुंबई खंडपीठ खंडपीठ खंडपीठ Income-tax Appellate Tribunal -“K”Bench Mumbai सव"ी सव"ी सव"ी राजे"" सव"ी राजे"" राजे"",लेखा राजे"" लेखा लेखा सद"य लेखा सद"य सद"य एवं सद"य एवं एवं, संदीप एवं संदीप संदीप गोसांई संदीप गोसांई गोसांई, "याियक गोसांई "याियक "याियक सद"य "याियक सद"य सद"य सद"य Before S/Shri Rajendra,Accountant Member and Sandeep Gosain,Judicial Member आय…

Coastal Gujarat Power Ltd, Mumbai vs. ITO 6(2)(1), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2298/MUM/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 Mar 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./ I.T.A. No 2298/Mum/2015 (निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2010-11) Coastal Gujarat Power Limited, The Income Tax Officer 34, Sant Tukaram Road, 6(2)(1), फनाभ/ Carnac Bunder, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Mumbai-400009 M K Road, Mumbai-400020 अऩीराथी की ओय से / Applicant By : Shri Farrokh V Irani प्रत्मथी की ओय से/Respondent By : Shri M C Omi Ningshen सुनवाई की तायीख /Date Of Hearing : 14.12.2016 घोषणा की तायीख /Date Of : 15.3.2017 Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar, A. M: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee & Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld.Cit(A), Mumbai, Dated25.2.2015 For The Assessment Year 2010-11. 2. The First Ground Raised By The Assessee Is Against Upholding The Order Of Assessing Officer As Regards Interest Income From Securities Deposited With Paschim Gujarat Vij Co.Ltd (Hereinafter Referred To As Pgvcl) For Availing Electricity For The Purposes Of Construction Of Power

For Respondent: Shri M C Omi Ningshen
Section 143(3)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, म ुंबई न्यायपीठ “एच” म ुंबई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “H” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM आमकय अऩीर सं./ I.T.A. No 2298/Mum/2015 (निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2010-11) Coastal Gujarat Power Limited, The Income Tax Officer 34, Sant Tukaram Road, 6(2)(1), फनाभ/ Carnac Bunder, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Mumbai-400009 M K Road, Mumbai-400020 अऩीराथी की ओय से / Applicant by : Shri Farrokh V Irani प्रत्मथी की ओय से/Respondent by : Shri M C Omi Ningshen सुनवाई की तायीख /Date of Hearing : 14.12.2016 घोषणा की तायीख /Date of : 15.3.2017 Pronouncement आदेश / O…