44BB(2). DIT v. Mitchell Drilling International Pvt. Ltd.

62 Taxmann.com 24High Court2015#5582 most cited

What is 44BB(2). DIT v. Mitchell Drilling International Pvt. Ltd. authority for?

For the purpose of computing presumptive income under Section 44BB(2), 'gross receipts' do not include service tax collected by the assessee and paid to the government, as it does not represent an amount paid to the assessee for services rendered in connection with mineral oil extraction.

21

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Also referred to as

DIT v. Mitchell Drilling International Pvt. Ltd. · section 44BB · gross receipts · presumptive income · service tax · mineral oils · prospecting · extraction · production

Also reported as

234 Taxmann 818

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 44BB(2). DIT v. Mitchell Drilling International Pvt. Ltd.

Forbes Continer Line Pre Ltd, Mumbai vs. ADIT (It) 3(2), Mumbai

ITA 1607/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Mar 2016AY 2009-10
For Appellant: Shri Girish DaveFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Modi
Section 144(3)Section 254(1)Section 44BSection 5(2)

…आयकर आयकर अपीलीय आयकर आयकर अपीलीय अपीलीय अिधकरण अपीलीय अिधकरण अिधकरण, ‘एल’ खंडपीठ अिधकरण खंडपीठ खंडपीठ मुंबई खंडपीठ मुंबई मुंबई मुंबई INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,MUMBAI “L” BENCH सव"ी सव"ी सव"ी राजे"" सव"ी राजे"" राजे"", लेखा राजे"" लेखा लेखा सद"य लेखा सद"य सद"य एवं सद"य एवं एवं राम लाल नेगी एवं राम लाल नेगी राम लाल नेगी, , , , "याियक सद"य राम लाल नेगी "याियक सद"य "याियक सद"य "याियक सद"य Before S/Sh. Rajendra,Accountant Member & Ram Lal Negi,Judicial Member आयकर आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं/.ITA No.1607/Mum/2014,िनधा"रण अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष"/Assessment Year-2009-10 वष" Forbes Co…