237(Kar); CIT v. Sociedade De Fomento Industrial (P.) Ltd.

123 Taxmann.com 38High Court2021#2687 most cited

What is 237(Kar); CIT v. Sociedade De Fomento Industrial (P.) Ltd. authority for?

Interest expenditure cannot be disallowed under Section 14A read with Rule 8D when the assessee possesses sufficient interest-free funds to cover investments that yield exempt income, even if mixed funds are utilized.

43

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Sociedade De Fomento Industrial (P.) Ltd. · 123 Taxmann.com 38 · Section 14A · Rule 8D · disallowance of expenditure · exempt income · interest expenditure · sufficient interest-free funds · mixed funds · expenditure for exempt income

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 237(Kar); CIT v. Sociedade De Fomento Industrial (P.) Ltd.

Dilip Hari Amdekar, Pune vs. Income-Tax Officer, Ward - 12(2), Pune

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is Partly Allowed

ITA 1303/PUN/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune03 Nov 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote. आयकर अपीलसं. / Ita No.1303/Pun/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 Dilip Hari Ambedkar, The Income Tax Officer, C/O.Ambedkar & Associates, Vs Ward-12(2), Pune. Flat No.302, Jai Ravi Appt. Cts No.1002/44, Rajendranagar, Behind Tendulkar Jogging Track, Navi Peth, Pune – 411030. Pan: Aappa 3065 J Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By None Revenue By Shri S P Walimbe – Dr Date Of Hearing 10/08/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 03/11/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-8, Pune, Dated 05.06.2018 For The A.Y. 2012-13 Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961(In Short “The Act”). The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Learned Cit(A) Erred In Upholding The Addition Made By Ao Of Rs.5,49,458/- U/S 14A Read With Rule 8D (Para 3) 2. The Learned Cit (A) Failed To Appreciate That Separate Books Of Accounts For Business & Investments Were Maintained. 3. The Learned Cit (A) Has Failed To Show That Expenditure Is Incurred By The Assesse For Investment.

Section 14ASection 250

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “ए” "ायपीठ पुणेम"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI S.S.GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER . आयकर अपीलसं. / ITA No.1303/PUN/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 Dilip Hari Ambedkar, The Income Tax Officer, C/o.Ambedkar & Associates, Vs Ward-12(2), Pune. Flat No.302, Jai Ravi Appt. CTS No.1002/44, Rajendranagar, Behind Tendulkar Jogging Track, Navi Peth, Pune – 411030. PAN: AAPPA 3065 J Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee by None Revenue by Shri S P Walimbe – DR Date of hearing 10/08/2022 Date of pronouncement…

M/S. Avinash Bhosale Infrastructure, Pune vs. DCIT Central Cir- 2(3), Mumbai

In the result, appeal by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1952/MUM/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Mar 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthyआअसं. 1952/मुं/2020 ("न.व 2017-18) M/S. Avinash Bhosale Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. 2, Abil House, Ganesh Khind Road, Range Hill Corner, Pune 411 007. Pan: Aabca-5452-C ...... अपीलाथ" /Appellant बनाम Vs. Dcit Central Cir 2(3), 8Th Floor, Room No.803, Old Cgo Bldg. Pratistha Bhavan, M.K. Road, Mumbai 400 020 ..... ""तवाद"/Respondent अपीलाथ" "वारा/ Appellant By : Shri Vijay Mehta ""तवाद" "वारा/Respondent By : Shri T. Shankar सुनवाई क" "त"थ/ Date Of Hearing : 28/12/2021 घोषणा क" "त"थ/ Date Of Pronouncement : 25/03/2022

For Appellant: Shri Vijay MehtaFor Respondent: Shri T. Shankar
Section 14ASection 14A(3)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण मुंबई पीठ “एस एम सी” , मुंबई "ी "वकास अव"थी, "या"यक सद"य के सम" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “SMC”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आअसं. 1952/मुं/2020 ("न.व 2017-18) M/s. Avinash Bhosale Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. 2, ABIL House, Ganesh Khind Road, Range Hill Corner, Pune 411 007. PAN: AABCA-5452-C ...... अपीलाथ" /Appellant बनाम Vs. DCIT Central Cir 2(3), 8th Floor, Room No.803, Old CGO Bldg. Pratistha Bhavan, M.K. Road, Mumbai 400 020 ..... ""तवाद"/Respondent अपीलाथ" "वारा/ Appellant by : Shri Vijay Mehta ""तवाद" "वारा/Respondent by : Shri T. Shankar सुनवा…

Northern Arc Capital Ltd (Formerly Known As Ifmr Capital Finance Pvt Ltd), Chennai vs. DCIT, Corp Cir-4(2), Chennai

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly

ITA 205/CHNY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V.Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.205/Chny/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15) M/S. Northern Arc Capital Ltd. Vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, [Formerly Known As Ifmr Capital Finance Pvt.Ltd.] Corporate Circle-4(2) 10Th Floor, Phase-I. Chennai. Iit Madras Research Park, Kanagam Village, Taramani, Chennai-600 113. Pan: Aacci 0979B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr. Suresh Periasamy,JCITFor Respondent: 02.08.2021
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 14A(2)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,‘ए’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी वी.दुगा" राव, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी जी.मंजुनाथ, लेखा सद"य के सम% BEFORE SHRI V.DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.205/Chny/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15) M/s. Northern Arc Capital Ltd. Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, [Formerly known as IFMR Capital Finance Pvt.Ltd.] Corporate Circle-4(2) 10th floor, Phase-I. Chennai. IIT Madras Research Park, Kanagam Village, Taramani, Chennai-600 113. PAN: AACCI 0979B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)…