237(Kar); CIT v. Sociedade De Fomento Industrial (P.) Ltd.

123 Taxmann.com 38High Court2021#2720 most cited

What is 237(Kar); CIT v. Sociedade De Fomento Industrial (P.) Ltd. authority for?

Interest expenditure cannot be disallowed under Section 14A read with Rule 8D when the assessee possesses sufficient interest-free funds to cover investments that yield exempt income, even if mixed funds are utilized.

43

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Sociedade De Fomento Industrial (P.) Ltd. · 123 Taxmann.com 38 · Section 14A · Rule 8D · disallowance of expenditure · exempt income · interest expenditure · sufficient interest-free funds · mixed funds · expenditure for exempt income

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 237(Kar); CIT v. Sociedade De Fomento Industrial (P.) Ltd.

PRIME MINERAL EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED (NOW AMALGAMATED WITH FOMENTO RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED),PANAJI vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE - 1, PANAJI

The appeal stands partly allowed for statistical purpose in aforestated terms

ITA 3/PAN/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji05 Jun 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliita Nos. 003/Pan/2023 Assessment Year : 2009-10 Prime Mineral Exports Pvt. Ltd. (Now Amalgamated With Fomento Resources Pvt. Ltd.) 102, 1St Fl. Kamat Metropolis-1, Behind Caculo Mall, St. Inez, Panaji, Goa-403001. . . . . . . .Appellant Pan : Aadcp1647E V/S Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, . . . . . . . Respondent Range-1, Panaji, Goa

For Appellant: Mr Nishant Thakkar [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr M. Satish [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 246ASection 250Section 253(1)Section 41(1)Section 4I

…the Ld. AR placed reliance on ‘UOI Vs Rajeev Bansal’ [2024, 469 ITR 46 (SC)], ‘Eicher Motors Ltd. Vs CIT’ [86 Taxmann.com 49 (Del)], ‘CIT Vs UP Electronics Corp. Ltd.’ [2017, 88 Taxmann.com 696 (All)], ‘CIT Vs Sociedade De Fomento Industrial (P). Ltd’ [2021, 123 Taxmann.com 38 (Bom)], and also the decision of Ld. Co-ordinate benches in the case of ‘DCIT Vs West Bengal Electronics Industry Development Corp. Ltd.’ [Manu/IK/0324/2018], and ‘Infrastructure Logistics (P) Ltd. Vs JCIT’ [2022, 196 ITD 153]. ITAT-Panaji Page 8 of 42 Prime Mineral Exports Pvt. Ltd.(Now Amalgamated with Fomento Resources Pvt. Ltd.) Vs J…

Showing 120 of 43 · Page 1 of 3