100 TT J 224 (IT AT Kolkatta) 4. West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. v. JCIT

16 SOT 509Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2007#2386 most cited

What is 100 TT J 224 (IT AT Kolkatta) 4. West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. v. JCIT authority for?

The Tribunal is bound by its own previous decision for a prior assessment year, especially when no contrary decision exists, and should follow consistent pronouncements of other High Courts and Tribunals.

48

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Assam Carbon Products Ltd v. ACIT · 100 TTJ 224 · ITAT Kolkatta · consistent view · assessee's own case · prior assessment year · Tribunal decision · High Court judgments · contrary decision

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 100 TT J 224 (IT AT Kolkatta) 4. West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. v. JCIT

Jindal Steel & Power Ltd., New Delhi vs. ACIT, Hisar

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 893/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Apr 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Saini & Sh. N. S. Sainiita No. 893/Del/2014 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Jindal Steel & Power Ltd., Vs Asstt. Commissioner Of Jindal Centre, 12, Bhikaji Cama Income Tax, Hisar Circle, Place, New Delhi-110066 Hisar (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacj7079D Assessee By : Sh. Salil Kapoor, Adv., Sh. Sumit Lal Chandani, Adv., Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Adv. & Ms. Pallavi Saigal, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. Sanjay I. Bara, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing :05.03.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 29.04.2019 Order Per N. S. Saini: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Assessing Officer U/S 143(3)/144C(13) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 29.10.2018 For Assessment Years 2013-14

For Appellant: Sh. Salil Kapoor, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Sanjay I. Bara, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 80Section 80I

…Representative relied on the orders of the Lower authorities. 11 Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. 25. We find that the issue is covered in favour of the assessee by the order of this Bench of the Tribunal in the case of the assessee itself in AY 2001-02 reported in 16 SOT 509 (Del) where it was held as under:- “12. We have carefully considered the submissions of both the parties on this aspect. The crux of the dispute before us relates to the manner of computing profits of the undertakings of the assessee engaged in generation of power for the purposes of relief under Section 80-IA of the Act. The difference between th…