100/223 Taxman 398/366 ITR 170 (Guj.) 3. CIT v. Merchem Ltd.

61 Taxmann.com 119High Court2015#578 most cited

What is 100/223 Taxman 398/366 ITR 170 (Guj.) 3. CIT v. Merchem Ltd. authority for?

An amendment clarifying the disallowance of employee contributions under sections 36(1)(va) and 43B is prospective. Therefore, before such amendment, employee contributions paid before the due date for filing the income tax return are deductible.

168

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,154 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Merchem Ltd. · CIT v. Merchem Ltd. · Section 36(1)(va) · Section 43B · employees' contribution to provident fund · employees' contribution to ESI · disallowance of employees' contribution · prospective amendment Finance Act 2021 · retrospective amendment · due date of payment employees' contribution · payment before ITR filing · 61 Taxmann.com 119

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 100/223 Taxman 398/366 ITR 170 (Guj.) 3. CIT v. Merchem Ltd.

Sivan Securities Private Limited, Bangalore vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 708/BANG/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore07 Feb 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2018-19 M/S. Sivan Securities Pvt. The Deputy Ltd., Commissioner Of No. 23/2, Coffeeday Square, Income Tax, Vittal Mallya Road, Cpc, Bangalore – 560 001. Bangalore. Vs. Pan: Aaccs5138G Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri C. Ramesh, Ca : Shri Priyadarshi Mishra, Addl. Revenue By Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 07-02-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07-02-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal By The Assessee Has Been Filed By Assessee Against The Order Dated 21.10.2021 Passed By The Ld.Cit(A)-11, Bangalore Relating To Assessment Year 2018-19 On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Is Opposed To The Facts Of The Case & Law Applicable To It. 2. The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Erred In Confirming The Disallowance Of Rs.11,05,657/- Invoking The Provisions Of Section 143(1)(A)(Ii) Of The Act, Holding That The Said Amount Is Assessable Under The Provisions Of Section 36(1)(Va) Of The Act.

For Appellant: Shri C. Ramesh, CA
Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…icles & Services (P) Ltd Vs. CIT (2018) 96 Taxmann.com 13 (Kerala) (ii) Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (2014) 41 Taxmann.com 100 (Gujarat) (iii) Unifac Management Services (India) Pvt Ltd (2018) 100 Taxmann.com (Madras) Page 3 of 8 (iv) Merchem Ltd 61 Taxmann.com 119 (Kerala) 7. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in relying on the Board Circular No.22/2015. dated 17.12.2015 ignoring the fact that, circular issued are not binding on the appellant and also appellate authorities, all the more so when there are contrary decisions by High Courts and also Supreme Court. 8. The learned Com…

M/S. Sterling Urban Developments Private Limited, Bengaluru vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-6(1)(2), Bangalore

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 450/BANG/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Nov 2021AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevanassessment Year : 2019-20 M/S. Sterling Urban Developments Private Limited, Vs. Dcit, 8, Level – 5 – Prestige Nebula, Circle – 6(1)(2), Cubbon Road, Bengaluru. Opp To It Office Building, Bengaluru – 560 001. Pan : Aaacf 9183 C Assessee By : Smt. Sunaina Bhatia, Ca Revenue By : Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel For The Department Date Of Hearing : 10.11.2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 10.11.2021 O R D E R

For Appellant: Smt. Sunaina Bhatia, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel for the Department
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 2Section 28Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC-A” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT Assessment Year : 2019-20 M/s. Sterling Urban Developments Private Limited, Vs. DCIT, 8, Level – 5 – Prestige Nebula, Circle – 6(1)(2), Cubbon Road, Bengaluru. Opp to IT Office Building, Bengaluru – 560 001. PAN : AAACF 9183 C Assessee by : Smt. Sunaina Bhatia, CA Revenue by : Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel for the Department Date of hearing : 10.11.2021 Date of Pronouncement : 10.11.2021 O R D E R Per N. V. Vasudevan, Vice President This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order dated 0…

Sonicwall Technology Systems India Private Limited ( Formerly Known As Dell Software India Private Limited), Bengaluru vs. Income Tax Officer (International Taxation), Ward-1(2), Bengaluru

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 419/BANG/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Nov 2021AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevanand Shri Chandra Poojariassessment Year : 2019-20 M/S. Sonicwall Technology Systems India Vs. Ito, Private Limited Ward International Taxation – 1(2), (Formerly Known As Dell Software India Pvt. Ltd.,) Bengaluru. Embassy Tech Village 3Rd & 4Th Floor, Block-F, Devarabisanahalli, Varthur Hobli, Bengaluru – 560 103. Pan : Aaacq 1441 N Assessee By : Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar, Advocate Revenue By : Shri. Priyadarshi Mishra, Additional Cit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru Date Of Hearing : 08.11.2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 10.11.2021 O R D E R

For Appellant: Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Priyadarshi Mishra, Additional CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 13Section 139Section 139(1)Section 154Section 2Section 28Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENTAND SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year : 2019-20 M/s. Sonicwall Technology Systems India Vs. ITO, Private Limited Ward International Taxation – 1(2), (formerly known as Dell Software India Pvt. Ltd.,) Bengaluru. Embassy Tech Village 3rd and 4th Floor, Block-F, Devarabisanahalli, Varthur Hobli, Bengaluru – 560 103. PAN : AAACQ 1441 N Assessee by : Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar, Advocate Revenue by : Shri. Priyadarshi Mishra, Additional CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru Date of hearing : 08.11.2021 Date of Pron…

Hindustan Apparel Industries, Mumbai vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax 21(3), Mumbai

In the result , appeal of the assessee in ITA no

ITA 215/MUM/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 Mar 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.214 & 215/Mum/2018 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2013-14 & 2014-15) बिाम/ Hindustan Apparel Acit 21(3), Industries, Piramal Chambers, Unit No. 4, Lower Parel, Mumbai V. Bradys Glady Plaza, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai-400025 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan: Aaafh0455J (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. Assessee By: Shri. Vijay Kumar S. Biyani Revenue By: Shri. Manoj Kumar Singh (Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख /Date Of Hearing : 24.01.2019 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 15.03.2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Ramit Kochar: These Two Appeals, Filed By Assessee, Being Ita No. 214 & 215/Mum/2018, Are Directed Against Common Appellate Order Dated 23.10.2017 In Appeal No. Cit(A)-33/Rg.21/260/2016-17 & 846/2016- 17, Passed By Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-33, Mumbai (Hereinafter Called “The Cit(A)”), For Assessment Year 2013-14 & 2014-15 Respectively, The Appellate Proceedings Had Arisen Before Learned Cit(A) From Two Separate Assessment Order(S) Dated 03.03.2016 & 28.12.2016 Respectively Passed By Learned Assessing Officer (Hereinafter Called “The Ao”) Both U/S 143(3) Of The Income-Tax

For Appellant: Shri. Vijay Kumar S. BiyaniFor Respondent: Shri. Manoj Kumar Singh (DR)
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण “H” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “H” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.214 & 215/Mum/2018 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2013-14 & 2014-15) बिाम/ Hindustan Apparel ACIT 21(3), Industries, Piramal Chambers, Unit No. 4, Lower Parel, Mumbai v. Bradys Glady Plaza, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai-400025 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ PAN: AAAFH0455J (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. Assessee by: Shri. Vijay Kumar S. Biyani Revenue by: Shri. Manoj Kumar Singh (DR) सुनवाई की…