Which sections of the Income Tax Act does 100/223 Taxman 398/366 ITR 170 (Guj.) 3. CIT v. Merchem Ltd. come up under?

It is most often cited in judgments turning on Section 40A(7), Section 139(1), Section 143(1), Section 143(3), Section 154, Section 250.

100/223 Taxman 398/366 ITR 170 (Guj.) 3. CIT v. Merchem Ltd.

Q: How many judgments cite 100/223 Taxman 398/366 ITR 170 (Guj.) 3. CIT v. Merchem Ltd.?

168 judgments on BharatTax cite 100/223 Taxman 398/366 ITR 170 (Guj.) 3. CIT v. Merchem Ltd. (61 Taxmann.com 119), spanning 2017 to 2025.

61 Taxmann.com 119High Court2015#578 most cited

What is 100/223 Taxman 398/366 ITR 170 (Guj.) 3. CIT v. Merchem Ltd. authority for?

An amendment clarifying the disallowance of employee contributions under sections 36(1)(va) and 43B is prospective. Therefore, before such amendment, employee contributions paid before the due date for filing the income tax return are deductible.

168

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Merchem Ltd. · CIT v. Merchem Ltd. · Section 36(1)(va) · Section 43B · employees' contribution to provident fund · employees' contribution to ESI · disallowance of employees' contribution · prospective amendment Finance Act 2021 · retrospective amendment · due date of payment employees' contribution · payment before ITR filing · 61 Taxmann.com 119

Also reported as

235 Taxmann 291

Sections most often in play

Section 40A(7)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 154 Section 250 Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Issues it is cited on

section 158be section 113 section 92f clarificatory amendment retrospective amendment section 158bb section 43b(b)employees contribution to pf section 36(1)(va)section 43b section 158b section 2(24)(x)

Judgments citing 100/223 Taxman 398/366 ITR 170 (Guj.) 3. CIT v. Merchem Ltd.

M/S Pramod Telecom Pvt.Ltd., Lucknow vs. DCIT/ACIT-3, Lucknow

In the result, in ITA. No

ITA 243/LKW/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow19 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Deepak Yadav, DR

Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW ‘B’ BENCH, LUCKNOW BEFORE SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.242 & 243/LKW/2022 A.Ys. 2018-19 & 2020-21 M/s Pramod Telecom Pvt. Ltd., 5, vs. The DCIT/ACIT-3, Ashok Marg, Gautam Budh Marg, Lucknow-New Lucknow-226018 PAN:AACCP3266E (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sh. Rakesh Garg, Advocate Revenue by: Sh. Deepak Yadav, DR Date of hearing: 05.06.2025 Date of pronouncement: 19.08.2025 O R D E R PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M.: These two appeals have been filed by the assessee against the separate orders of the ld. CIT(A)…

M/S Pramod Telecom Pvt.Ltd., Lucknow vs. DCIT/ACIT-3, Lucknow

In the result, in ITA. No

ITA 242/LKW/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow19 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Deepak Yadav, DR

Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

ITO, Angul Ward, Angul vs. M/S. Ncc Smasl Jrt(Jv), Angul

ITA 99/CTK/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack25 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor and Bibhu Jain, AdvsFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, CIT-DR

Section 40A(2)(b)

…आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, कटक न्यायऩीठ,कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अऩीऱ सं/ITA No.39/CTK/2018 आयकर अऩीऱ सं/ITA No.99/CTK/2019 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2013-2014 & 2014-2015) ITO, Angul Ward, Angul Vs M/s NCC-SMASL-JRT(JV), C/o-Sainik Mining and Allied Services Ltd., Near Jagannath Project Office PO: South Balanda, Talcher, Angul-759116 PAN No. :AABAN 3785 B AND Cross Objection No.27/CTK/2018 (Arising out of ITA No.39/CTK/2018) (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2013-2014 & 2014-2015) M/s…

ITO, Angul Ward, Angul vs. Ncc-Smasl-Jrt(Jv), Angul

ITA 39/CTK/2018[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack25 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor and Bibhu Jain, AdvsFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, CIT-DR

Section 40A(2)(b)

M/S Kanaka Polypack Private Limited, Aluva vs. ACIT Corporate Circle 1(1), Kochi

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 876/COCH/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Mar 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George George K & Ms. Padmavathy Sassessment Year :2018-19 M/S. Kanaka Polypack Private Limited, Acit, Vs. Xvi, Keezhmad Panchayat, Corporate Circle - 1(1), Ashokapuram,Aluva, Kochi – 682 018. Ernakulam District, Kerala – 683 101. Pan :Aafck 1498 J Assessee Respondent

For Appellant: Shri. Manu Kurian, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr. AR

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 34(1)(iv)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENCH :COCHIN BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND MS. PADMAVATHY S, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year :2018-19 M/s. Kanaka Polypack Private Limited, ACIT, Vs. XVI, Keezhmad Panchayat, Corporate Circle - 1(1), Ashokapuram,Aluva, Kochi – 682 018. Ernakulam District, Kerala – 683 101. PAN :AAFCK 1498 J ASSESSEE RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. Manu Kurian, CA Revenue by : Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr. AR. Date of hearing : 28.02.2023 Date of Pronouncement : 08.03.2023 O R D E R Per Padmavathy S, Accountant Member This appeal by the assessee is against the order passed…

Lioyd Healthcare Pvt Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT (CPC) Bangalore, Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2342/MUM/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Feb 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh () & Shri S Rifaur Rahman () Lloyd Healthcare Pvt Ltd Vs Dcit (Cpc), Bangalore Unit No.3A, Wing B, 2Nd Floor Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai- Times Square, Marol 400 020 Andheri Kurla Road Andheri East, Mumbai-400 059 Pan : Aaccl1129L Appellant Respondent

Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 234ASection 36Section 36(1)(va)

…1 ITA 2342/Mum/2022 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “A”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI KULDIP SINGH (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Lloyd Healthcare Pvt Ltd vs DCIT (CPC), Bangalore Unit No.3A, Wing B, 2nd Floor Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai- Times Square, Marol 400 020 Andheri Kurla Road Andheri East, Mumbai-400 059 PAN : AACCL1129L APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee represented by Shri Bhupendra Shah Department represented by Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha, (Sr. AR) Date of hearing 09/01/2023 Date of pronouncement 23/02/2023 ORDER PER: KULDIP SINGH (JM): The Appellant, Lloyd Healthcare Pvt…

Doddaiah Kavitha, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 952/BANG/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore02 Feb 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevanassessment Year : 2018-19 Ms. Doddaiah Kavitha, Vs. Dcit, No.1/1, 57Th ‘D’ Cross, 3Rd Block, Central Processing Centre, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru. Bengaluru – 560 010. Pan : Boypk 6785 B Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Manishankar S, Ca Revenue By : Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel Date Of Hearing : 31.01.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 02.02.2023 O R D E R This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 26.07.2022 Of Nfac, Delhi, Relating To Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. The Issue Involved In This Appeal Is As To Whether The Employees’ Contribution To Provident Fund & Employees State Insurance Which The Employer Deducts & Pays Over To The Concerned Authorities Beyond The Date Prescribed For Payment Of Such Contribution But Nevertheless The Contribution Has Been Paid Within The Due Date Prescribed For Filing Return Of Income U/S.139(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961, Can Be Allowed As Deduction By Applying The Second Proviso To Sec.43B Of The Act. 3. In So Far As The Question Whether The Employees Contribution To Provident Fund & Employees State Insurance Which The Employer Deducts & Pays Over To The Concerned Authorities Beyond The Date Prescribed For Page 2 Of 6

For Appellant: Shri. Manishankar S, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel

Section 139(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 34(1)(iv)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC - A” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N. V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT Assessment Year : 2018-19 Ms. Doddaiah Kavitha, Vs. DCIT, No.1/1, 57th ‘D’ Cross, 3rd Block, Central Processing Centre, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru. Bengaluru – 560 010. PAN : BOYPK 6785 B APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. Manishankar S, CA Revenue by : Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel Date of hearing : 31.01.2023 Date of Pronouncement : 02.02.2023 O R D E R This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dated 26.07.2022 of NFAC, Delhi, relating to Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. The issue involv…

M/S. Suresh Electricals, Bellary vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, CPC, Bengaluru

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 724/BANG/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Nov 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevanassessment Year : 2018-19 M/S. Suresh Electricals, Vs. Dcit, Ward No.25, Cmc T. S. No.227, Tilak Cpc, Nagar, Khb Colony, Bengaluru. Bellary – 583 101. Pan : Abyfs 9751 M Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. B. S. Balachandran, Advocate Revenue By : Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel Date Of Hearing : 23.11.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 24.11.2022 O R D E R This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of Nfac, Delhi, Dated 12.07.2022, Relating To Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. The Only Issue That Arises For Consideration In This Appeal Is As To Whether The Revenue Authorities Were Justified In Disallowing Payment Made To Esi/Pf Being Employees’ Share Of Contribution Under Section 36(1)(Va) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called ‘The Act’). 3. In This Regard, It Is Pertinent To Note That The Employee Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Was Promulgated To Provide For Such Institution Of Provident Funds, Pension Fund & Deposit-Linked Insurance Fund For Employees In Factories & Other Establishments. It Aims To Build Adequate Retirement Corpus For The Salaried Class Of Employees. The Fund Includes Contributions From The Employer & Employee Both, Page 2 Of 14

For Appellant: Shri. B. S. Balachandran, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel

Section 2Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC - C” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N. V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT Assessment Year : 2018-19 M/s. Suresh Electricals, Vs. DCIT, Ward No.25, CMC T. S. No.227, Tilak CPC, Nagar, KHB Colony, Bengaluru. Bellary – 583 101. PAN : ABYFS 9751 M APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. B. S. Balachandran, Advocate Revenue by : Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel Date of hearing : 23.11.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 24.11.2022 O R D E R This is an appeal by the assessee directed against the order of NFAC, Delhi, dated 12.07.2022, relating to Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. The only…

Bhoruka Fabcons Private Limited, Mysuru vs. The Assistant Director of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 910/BANG/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Nov 2022AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevanassessment Year : 2020-21 M/S. Bhoruka Fabcons Pvt. Ltd., Vs. The Assistant Director Of Income Tax, No.427E, Hebbal Industrial Area, Cpc, Mysuru – 570 016. Bengaluru. Pan : Aaccb 9377 N Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Bhargava S. N, Ca Revenue By : Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel Date Of Hearing : 23.11.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 24.11.2022 O R D E R This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of Nfac, Delhi, Dated 28.07.2022, Relating To Assessment Year 2020-21. 2. The Only Issue That Arises For Consideration In This Appeal Is As To Whether The Revenue Authorities Were Justified In Disallowing Payment Made To Esi/Pf Being Employees’ Share Of Contribution Under Section 36(1)(Va) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called ‘The Act’). 3. In This Regard, It Is Pertinent To Note That The Employee Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Was Promulgated To Provide For Such Institution Of Provident Funds, Pension Fund & Deposit-Linked Insurance Fund For Employees In Factories & Other Establishments. It Aims To Build Adequate Retirement Corpus For The Salaried Class Of Employees. The Fund Includes Contributions From The Employer & Employee Both, Calculated In The Prescribed Manner Under The Relevant Act. As Per Page 2 Of 13

For Appellant: Shri. Bhargava S. N, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel

Section 2Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC - C” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N. V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT Assessment Year : 2020-21 M/s. Bhoruka Fabcons Pvt. Ltd., Vs. The Assistant Director of Income Tax, No.427E, Hebbal Industrial Area, CPC, Mysuru – 570 016. Bengaluru. PAN : AACCB 9377 N APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. Bhargava S. N, CA Revenue by : Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel Date of hearing : 23.11.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 24.11.2022 O R D E R This is an appeal by the assessee directed against the order of NFAC, Delhi, dated 28.07.2022, relating to Assessment Year 2020-21. 2. The…

Chase Security, Bangalore vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-6(3)(1), Bangalore

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 796/BANG/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Nov 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevanassessment Year : 2018-19 M/S. Chase Security, Vs. The Ito, No.16/A, 1St Floor, Millar Tank Bund Ward – 6(3)(1), Cpc, Road, Vasanth Nagar, Bengaluru. Bengaluru – 560 052. Pan : Aaefc 2412 L Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Smt. Sheethal Borkar, Advocate Revenue By : Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel Date Of Hearing : 21.11.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 23.11.2022 O R D E R This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Dated 29.04.2021 By The Nfac, Delhi Relating To Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. The Only Issue That Arises For Consideration In This Appeal Is As To Whether The Revenue Authorities Were Justified In Disallowing Payment Made To Esi/Pf Being Employees’ Share Of Contribution Under Section 36(1)(Va) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called ‘The Act’). 3. In This Regard, It Is Pertinent To Note That The Employee Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Was Promulgated To Provide For Such Institution Of Provident Funds, Pension Fund & Deposit-Linked Insurance Fund For Employees In Factories & Other Establishments. It Aims To Build Adequate Retirement Corpus For The Salaried Class Of Employees. The Fund Includes Contributions From The Employer & Employee Both, Page 2 Of 14

For Appellant: Smt. Sheethal Borkar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel

Section 2Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC - C” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N. V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT Assessment Year : 2018-19 M/s. Chase Security, Vs. The ITO, No.16/A, 1st Floor, Millar Tank Bund Ward – 6(3)(1), CPC, Road, Vasanth Nagar, Bengaluru. Bengaluru – 560 052. PAN : AAEFC 2412 L APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Smt. Sheethal Borkar, Advocate Revenue by : Shri. Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel Date of hearing : 21.11.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 23.11.2022 O R D E R This is an appeal by the assessee directed against the order dated 29.04.2021 by the NFAC, Delhi relating to Assessment Year 201…

M/S, Madras Hydraulic Hose Pvt Ltd, Chennai vs. DCIT, Corporate Circle-4(1), Chennai

Appeal is allowed

ITA 702/CHNY/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Sept 2022AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singhand Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri. Saroj Kumar Parida (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) –Ld. DR

Section 139(1)Section 154Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय +ी महावीर िसंह, उपा12 एवं माननीय+ी मनोज कुमार अ6वाल ,लेखा सद9 के सम2। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENTAND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No.702/Chny/2022 (िनधाBरणवषB / Assessment Year: 2020-21) M/s. Madras Hydraulic Hose Pvt. Ltd. DCIT बनाम/ Flat No. 5, Harrington Apartments, Corporate Circle -4(1), No. 211, 98, Harrington Road, Vs. Chennai. Chetpet, Chennai – 600 031. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AAACM-4367-P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे…

Late Mr.Seshadri Naidu Dharmaraj Rep by Legal Heir - Mr.Shankar Ganesh, Chennai vs. CPC, Bangalore

Appeal is allowed

ITA 661/CHNY/2022[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Sept 2022AY 2019-2020

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singhand Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) –Ld. DR

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय +ी महावीर िसंह, उपा12 एवं माननीय +ी मनोज कुमार अ6वाल ,लेखा सद9 के सम2। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENTAND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No.660/Chny/2022 (िनधाBरणवषB / Assessment Year: 2018-19) & आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No.661/Chny/2022 (िनधाBरणवषB / Assessment Year: 2019-20) Late Mr. Seshadri Naidu Dharmaraj DCIT बनाम/ Rep. by Mr. Shankar Ganesh CPC, No. 10, 2nd Street,Ulaganathapuram, Bangalore. Vs. Ennore, Chennai – 600 057. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AECPD-3635-A (अप…

Late Mr.Seshadri Naidu Dharmaraj Rep by Legal Heir - Mr.Shankar Ganesh, Chennai vs. CPC, Bangalore

Appeal is allowed

ITA 660/CHNY/2022[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Sept 2022AY 2018-2019

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singhand Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) –Ld. DR

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय +ी महावीर िसंह, उपा12 एवं माननीय +ी मनोज कुमार अ6वाल ,लेखा सद9 के सम2। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENTAND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No.660/Chny/2022 (िनधाBरणवषB / Assessment Year: 2018-19) & आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No.661/Chny/2022 (िनधाBरणवषB / Assessment Year: 2019-20) Late Mr. Seshadri Naidu Dharmaraj DCIT बनाम/ Rep. by Mr. Shankar Ganesh CPC, No. 10, 2nd Street,Ulaganathapuram, Bangalore. Vs. Ennore, Chennai – 600 057. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AECPD-3635-A (अप…

Mansoor Aiyaz Ebrahim, Chennai vs. Assistant Dirctor of Incometax, CPC, Bangalore

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 622/CHNY/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Aug 2022AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Sonjoy Sarma

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Narayanan (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Ms. M.S. Deeeptha (JCIT) –Ld. DR

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘बी’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय +ी मनोज कुमार अ/वाल ,लेखा सद4 एवं माननीय +ी संजय शमा8, "ाियक सद4 के सम9। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM AND HON’BLE SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA Nos.621 & 622/Chny/2022 (िनधा8रण वष8 / Assessment Years: 2019-20 & 2020-21) Mansoor Aiyaz Ebrahim ADIT, बनाम/ No.1/1 Bishop Garden, Green Ways Road, CPC, Bengalore. Vs. Chennai – 600 028. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No. AAAPE-0488-Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri N.V. Narayan…

Mansoor Aiyaz Ebrahim, Chennai vs. Assistant Dirctor of Incometax, CPC, Bangalore

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 621/CHNY/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Aug 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Sonjoy Sarma

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Narayanan (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Ms. M.S. Deeeptha (JCIT) –Ld. DR

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Tonglit Autogistic Private Limited, Chennai vs. Asst Director of It, CPC Income Tax Department, Banglore

Appeal is allowed

ITA 566/CHNY/2022[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Aug 2022AY 2018-2019

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Sonjoy Sarma

For Appellant: Shri Ganesh. S (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Ms. M.S. Deeeptha (JCIT) –Ld. DR

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘बी’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय +ी मनोज कुमार अ/वाल ,लेखा सद4 एवं माननीय +ी संजय शमा8, "ाियक सद4 के सम9। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM AND HON’BLE SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.566/Chny/2022 (िनधा8रण वष8 / Assessment Year: 2018-19) Tonglit Autogistic Pvt. Ltd. ADIT, बनाम/ Plot No.55, HIG, MGR Salai, NH-1, CPC, Bengalore. Vs. Maraimalai Nagar, Chennai – 603 209. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No. AADCT-6520-E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri Ganesh. S…

M/S.Kerala State Warehousing Corpn, Ernakulam vs. The ACIT, Kochi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 389/COCH/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Aug 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahum/S. Kerala State Warehousing Vs Acit, Corporate Circle 1(2) Corporation Is Press Road Kochi 682018 Pb No. 1727, Warehousing Corporation Road Ernakulam 682016 Pan – Aabck1583G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri K. Gopi, Ca Revenue By: Shri Shantam Bose, Cit Dr

For Appellant: Shri K. Gopi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Shantam Bose, CIT DR

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 263Section 42

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN Before Shri George George K., Judicial Member and Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Accountant Member M/s. Kerala State Warehousing vs ACIT, Corporate Circle 1(2) Corporation IS Press Road Kochi 682018 PB No. 1727, Warehousing Corporation Road Ernakulam 682016 PAN – AABCK1583G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri K. Gopi, CA Revenue by: Shri Shantam Bose, CIT DR Date of hearing: 29/06/2022 Date of pronouncement: 04/08/2022 O R D E R Per: L.P. Sahu, A.M. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,…

Optech Engineering Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai vs. ADIT, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2128/MUM/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Jul 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopalassessment Years: 2017-18 M/S. Optech Engineering Pvt. Asst. Director Of Income Tax, Ltd., Cpc, D 151, Amar Gian, Post Bag No.2, Vs. Opp New St Stand, Electronic City Post Office, Khopat, Bangalore – 560 500 Thane- 400 601 Pan: Aaaco7459C (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Dinesh Singh, D.R. Date Of Hearing : 20 . 07 . 2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 25 . 07 . 2022 O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh: The Present Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Ld. Cit(A), Nfac, Delhi, Which In Turn Arises From The Order Passed By The A.O. U/S 143(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961, For A.Y. 2017-18. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Before Us:

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Dinesh Singh, D.R

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “C”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Years: 2017-18 M/s. Optech Engineering Pvt. Asst. Director of Income Tax, Ltd., CPC, D 151, Amar Gian, Post Bag No.2, Vs. Opp New ST Stand, Electronic City Post Office, Khopat, Bangalore – 560 500 Thane- 400 601 PAN: AAACO7459C (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Dinesh Singh, D.R. Date of Hearing : 20 . 07 . 2022 Date of Pronouncement : 25 . 07 . 2022 O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh, Accountant Member: The present app…

M/S Amalgamations Repco Ltd, Chennai vs. DCIT, CPC, Bangalore

Appeal is allowed

ITA 559/CHNY/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jul 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri R,Vijayaraghvan (Advocate)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT)-Ld. Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘सी’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, उपा"" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.559/Chny/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Amalgamations Repco Limited DCIT बनाम/ No.136, J Graden, GNT Road CPC, Vs. Ponnaiamman Medu. Chennai – 600 110 Bengaluru – 560 100 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No. AADCA-8200-E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri R,Vijayaraghva…

United Shippers Ltd., Mumbai vs. Dy CIT 3 (3), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 7801/MUM/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 Jul 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amarjit Singhunited Shippers Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of 3Rd Floor, Prospect Income Tax-3(3) Chambers, D.N. Road, Air India Building, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021 स्थायी लेखा सं./ जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No: Aaacu0764C Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Aakash Marthak &For Respondent: Ms. Vranda U. Matkari

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(a)Section 36(1)(va)Section 41(1)Section 43B

…ITA No.7801/Mum/2019 A.Y.2016-17 1 United Shippers Limited Vs. DCIT-3(3) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “F” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER United Shippers Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of 3rd Floor, Prospect Income Tax-3(3) Chambers, D.N. Road, Air India Building, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021 स्थायी लेखा सं./ जीआइआर सं./ PAN/GIR No: AAACU0764C Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : Aakash Marthak & Bhupendra Karkhanis Respondent by : Ms. Vranda U. Matkari Date of Hearing 05.07.2022 Date of Pronouncement 15.07.2…