1. CIT v. Gem Plus Jewellery India Ltd.

233 CTR 248High Court2010#7764 most cited

What is 1. CIT v. Gem Plus Jewellery India Ltd. authority for?

An assessee is eligible for deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, as decided in the assessee's own case for earlier assessment years.

14

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v Gem Plus Jewellery India Ltd · 233 CTR 248 · Section 10A · deduction eligibility · assessee's own case

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 1. CIT v. Gem Plus Jewellery India Ltd.

M/S. Gorur Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd., Pune vs. Joint Commissioner of Income-Tax, Pune

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 13/PUN/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Jan 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.13/Pun/2016 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11 M/S. Gorur Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd., C/O. D.Y. Pandit, Advocate, 1187/10, Krupa, Shivaji Nagar, Pune-411005. .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant Pan : Aadcg5519J बनाम / V/S. Jt. Cit, Panvel Range, ……""यथ" / Respondent Panvel. Assessee By : Shri Deepa Khare Revenue By : Shri S. P. Walimbe सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 22.01.2020 घोषणा क" तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 28.01.2020 आदेश / Order Per D. Karunakara Rao, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against The Order Of The Cit(A)-2, Thane Dated 28.10.2015 For The Assessment Year 2010-11. 2. The Grounds Raised By The Assessee Are As Under :- “1. The Appellate Order Passed By Ld. Cit (A) 2, Thane Is Contrary To Facts Of The Case & Against The Provisions Of Law & Passed With Preconceive Notion & Best Of Conjectures & Surmises & Therefore Requires To Be Quashed. 2.A). The Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Panvel Renge Disallowed The Payment Amounting To Rs. 2,29,96,335/- Made To Four Suppliers Of Pipes On The Ground That Assessee Could Not Substantiate Its Claim By Furnishing Stock Register & Material Inward Details & Relied Upon The Information Received From The Sales Tax Department. Infact The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax Panvel Rang Did Not Ask For Providing Such Details Of Stock Registers Or Material Inward Details During Assessment Proceedings.

For Appellant: Shri Deepa KhareFor Respondent: Shri S. P. Walimbe
Section 80I

…d bogus purchases would be added back to the infrastructural profit of the assessee which is exempt u/s. 80IA(4)(b) read with clause (c) of the explanation to sec. 80IA of the Act, as held by the Bombay High Court in the case CIT v/s Gems Plus Jewellery Ltd., 233 CTR 248.” 4. Before us, at the outset, ld. Counsel for the assessee brought our attention to the above extracted additional ground and submitted that this is a legal issue raised by the assessee and the same should be admitted and adjudicated in preference to the original grounds raised by the assessee in the present appeal. Mentioning that the Assessing…