6 orders · Page 1 of 1
The Tribunal held that the appeals are not maintainable on account of low tax effect, as the tax effect in each individual assessment year was below the prescribed monetary limit. The Tribunal relied on the decision of the Karnataka High Court in CIT vs. PSI Hydraulics.
The Tribunal held that the appeals are not maintainable on account of low tax effect, as the tax effect in each individual assessment year was below the prescribed monetary limit. The Tribunal relied on the decision of the Karnataka High Court in CIT vs. PSI Hydraulics.
The Tribunal held that the appeals are not maintainable on account of low tax effect, as the tax effect in each individual assessment year was below the prescribed monetary limit. The Tribunal relied on the decision of the Karnataka High Court in CIT vs. PSI Hydraulics.
The Tribunal held that the appeals are not maintainable on account of low tax effect, as the tax effect in each individual assessment year was below the prescribed monetary limit. The Tribunal relied on the decision of the Karnataka High Court in CIT vs. PSI Hydraulics.
The Tribunal held that the appeals are not maintainable on account of low tax effect, as the tax effect in each individual assessment year was below the prescribed monetary limit. The Tribunal relied on the decision of the Karnataka High Court in CIT vs. PSI Hydraulics.
The Tribunal held that the appeals are not maintainable on account of low tax effect, as the tax effect in each individual assessment year was below the prescribed monetary limit. The Tribunal relied on the decision of the Karnataka High Court in CIT vs. PSI Hydraulics.