ITAT Pune Judgments — April 2026

RAMDAS NAGNATH SALUNKE,MUMBAI vs ITO, WARD 2(1), SOLAPUR

ITA 1441/PUN/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-2022Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

MAHESH ISHWARLAL BHA vs AR,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAIVS.THE ITO WARD 1(4), JALGAON

ITA 1415/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

CHANDRASHEKHAR SHANTARAM KULKARNI,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO WARD 1(1), AURANGBAD

ITA 1406/PUN/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-22Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

SHAHIDA JAPHARHUEN SANDE,MUMBAI vs ITO, WARD 10(1), PUNE

ITA 1442/PUN/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-2021Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

KALPANA ANANT SONAR,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO WARD 1, DHULE

ITA 1414/PUN/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-22Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

SWAMIRAO BHAGAWAN SURAWASE,MUMBAI vs ITO, WARD 2(1) SOLAPUR, SOLAPUR

ITA 1435/PUN/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-2022Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

JITENDRA BASAVARAJ NAGURE ,MUMBAI vs ITO WD-13(2), PUNE

ITA 1139/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

RAJENDRA PRABHAKAR PATIL,MUMBAI vs ITO WD-1(4), JALGAON, JALGAON

ITA 1141/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

RAJENDRA PRABHAKAR PATIL,MUMBAI vs ITO WD-1(4), JALGAON, JALGAON

ITA 1142/PUN/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-22Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

DNYANDEO MARUTI GAIKAR,MUMBAI vs ITO WD-2, AHMEDNAGAR

ITA 1143/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

DNYANDEO MARUTI GAIKAR ,MUMBAI vs ITO WD-2, AHMEDNAGAR

ITA 1144/PUN/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-22Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

SACHIN KRUSHNARAO BHUJBAL,PUNE vs INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 4(1), PUNE

ITA 1145/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

MAHESH ISHWARLAL BHA vs AR,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAIVS.THE ITO WARD 1(4), JALGAON

ITA 1416/PUN/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-22Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

DILIP KALU PATKAR,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO WARD 2(1) NASHIK, NASHIK

ITA 1418/PUN/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-22Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

ASHOK DEVIDASRAO BHALE,MUMBAI vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1, , NANDED

ITA 1322/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

KAMLAKAR CHANDRAKANT DESHPANDE,MUMBAI vs ITO, WARD 1(5), AURANGABAD

ITA 1319/PUN/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-2022Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

DILIP KALU PATKAR,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO WARD 2(1) NASHIK, NASHIK

ITA 1417/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

KAMLAKAR CHANDRAKANT DESHPANDE,MUMBAI vs ITO, WARD 1(5), AURANGABAD

ITA 1318/PUN/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-2021Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

SHANKAR SAMPATRAO HON,AURANGABAD vs INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1), AURANGABAD

ITA 1152/PUN/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-22Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

SURESH NIVAS TANDALE,MUMBAI vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 5, SANGLI

ITA 1449/PUN/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-22Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

SHANKAR SAMPATRAO HON,AURANGABAD vs INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1), AURANGABAD

ITA 1151/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

SHIVAJI VALU WARUNGASE,MUMBAI vs INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1, DHULE

ITA 1150/PUN/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-22Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

ASHOK DEVIDASRAO BHALE,MUMBAI vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1, NANDED

ITA 1323/PUN/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-22Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

MEENAKSHI SHAMKANT NER,NEW MARIEN LINE vs THE ITO WARD 1, MALEGAON

ITA 1379/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

RAJARAM DHANAJI GHOLAP,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO WARD 1(5), AURANGABAD

ITA 1410/PUN/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-22Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

CHANDRAKUMAR VITTHALRAO DHAVALSHANKH,NEW MARIEN LINE vs THE ITO WARD 1, MALEGAON

ITA 1381/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

MANOJ RAGHUNATH SHIRSATH,NIPHAD vs ASESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, NASHIK

ITA 507/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Remanded

The Tribunal found that the assessee was not given sufficient opportunity to present their case and that their submissions were not properly considered. Therefore, the issues were restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.

MANGESH MADHUKAR JOSHI,NEW MARIEN LINE vs THE ITO WARD 2(1), NASHIK

ITA 1383/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

SHIVAJI VALU WARUNGASE,AURANGABAD vs INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1, DHULE

ITA 1149/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

RAMRAO GANGARAM JYOTIK,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO WARD 2, AHMEDNAGAR

ITA 1385/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

RAMRAO GANGARAM JYOTIK,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO WARD 2, AHMEDNAGAR

ITA 1386/PUN/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-22Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

MADHUKAR VEDU MALI,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO WARD 1, DHULE

ITA 1387/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

RAJENDRA BHARATRAO SHISODE,PUNE vs INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 4(2), PUNE

ITA 1148/PUN/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-22Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

PRAMOD LALCHAND PATIL,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO WARD 2(1), NASHIK

ITA 1389/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

KALPANA ANANT SONAR,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO WARD 1, DHULE

ITA 1413/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

SUDHA SANJEEV JOSHI,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO WARD 2(1), SOLAPUR

ITA 1391/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

RAJENDRA BHARATRAO SHISODE,PUNE vs INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 4(2), PUNE

ITA 1147/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

SUBHASH RAJARAM CHAVAN,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO WARD 2, PANDHARPUR

ITA 1393/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

SUBHASH RAJARAM CHAVAN,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO WARD 2, PANDHARPUR

ITA 1394/PUN/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-22Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

ANITA VINAYAK BORGAONKAR,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO CIRCLE-12, PUNE

ITA 1395/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

ANITA VINAYAK BORGAONKAR,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO CIRCLE-12, PUNE

ITA 1396/PUN/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-22Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

RAJENDRA EKNATH NAGE,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO WARD 2, AHMEDNAGAR

ITA 1397/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

SACHIN KRUSHNARAO BHUJBAL,PUNE vs INCOME TAX OFFICER WWARD 4(1), PUNE

ITA 1146/PUN/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-22Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

PRIYANKA PRAKASH KHANDKAR,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO WARD 13(2), PUNE

ITA 1399/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

PRIYANKA PRAKASH KHANDKAR,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO WARD 13(2), PUNE

ITA 1400/PUN/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-22Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

RUCHIRA RAJAN KARANGUTKAR,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO WARD 1, KUDAL

ITA 1401/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

RUCHIRA RAJAN KARANGUTKAR,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO WARD 1, KUDAL

ITA 1402/PUN/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-22Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

GAURI SHASHIKANT NAGALE,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO WARD 2(1), NASHIK

ITA 1403/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2020-21Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

GAURI SHASHIKANT NAGALE,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO WARD 2(1), NASHIK

ITA 1404/PUN/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-22Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.

WALMIK PATLOBA CHATE,NEW MARIEN LINE MUMBAI vs THE ITO WARD 1(5), AURANGBAD

ITA 1423/PUN/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 Apr 2026AY 2021-22Allowed

The Tribunal held that the compensation received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme was in the nature of retrenchment compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.