Loading ITAT cases…
185 orders · Page 4 of 4
The Tribunal held that the additions were not based on any seized material and that the amounts were too meager to disbelieve the assessee's financial capacity. The AO also failed to provide material to support the low withdrawal addition.
The Tribunal granted the appellant's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal granted permission to the assessee to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal granted permission to the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer exceeded his jurisdiction by making additions on a subject matter not forming the basis for the notice issued under Section 147/148. The Assessing Officer should have addressed the original reason for reopening or issued a separate notice for new issues.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal granted the appellant's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted permission to the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer exceeded his jurisdiction by making additions on a subject matter not forming the basis for the notice issued under Section 147/148. The Assessing Officer should have addressed the original reason for reopening or issued a separate notice for new issues.
The tribunal granted the appellant permission to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal, in the interest of justice, decided to grant the assessee one more opportunity to present their case before the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer was directed to decide the matter after considering all submissions and adhering to the principles of natural justice.
The Tribunal, in the interest of justice, decided to grant the assessee one more opportunity to present their case before the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer was directed to decide the matter after considering all submissions and adhering to the principles of natural justice.
The Tribunal granted permission to the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal, in the interest of justice, decided to grant the assessee one more opportunity to present their case before the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer was directed to decide the matter after considering all submissions and adhering to the principles of natural justice.
The Tribunal, in the interest of justice, granted the assessee one more opportunity to present their submissions before the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer was directed to decide the case after considering all submissions and adhering to the principles of natural justice.
The Tribunal, in the interest of justice, decided to grant the assessee one more opportunity to present their case before the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer was directed to decide the matter after considering all submissions and adhering to the principles of natural justice.
The Tribunal, in the interest of justice, decided to grant the assessee one more opportunity to present their case before the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer was directed to decide the matter after considering all submissions and adhering to the principles of natural justice.
The tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. The Revenue had no objection to the withdrawal.
The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The Tribunal permitted the withdrawal.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal as they had filed a declaration and received a certificate under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act. The Tribunal permitted the withdrawal.