ANUJ MANEKLAL BHANDARI,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2(4), PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2756/PUN/2017Status: DisposedITAT Pune02 February 2021AY 2011-125 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal, in the interest of justice, granted the assessee one more opportunity to present their submissions before the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer was directed to decide the case after considering all submissions and adhering to the principles of natural justice.

What were the facts?

The assessee failed to appear on multiple hearing dates and did not provide written replies or explanations to notices issued by the Assessing Officer. Consequently, a penalty was levied under Section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act.

What were the issues?

Whether the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with notices was justified, and if the assessee was denied a proper opportunity to be heard.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 271(1)(b),Section 274,Section 143(2),Section 142(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, PUNE

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY

For Appellant: Shri Vardhaman Jain
Hearing: 02.02.2021Pronounced: 02.02.2021

आदेश / ORDER PER BENCH:

1.

These six appeals preferred by the assessee emanates from the common order of the Ld. CIT(Appeals)-12, Pune dated 09.08.2017 for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2013-14 as per the grounds of appeal on record.

2. At the very outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that common issue of grievance in all these appeals is with regard to the imposition of penalty u/s.271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as „the Act‟) by the Assessing Officer and as confirmed by the Ld. CIT(Appeals).

3.

Both the parties agreed that the facts, circumstances and issue in all these appeals are similar and therefore, these cases were heard together and disposed of vide this consolidated order.

4.

That on perusal of the penalty order passed u/s.271(1)(b) of the Act, it is observed that the date of hearing was fixed on 14.09.2015. However, there was no compliance from the assessee and neither any written reply/adjournment letter from the assessee were received. Therefore, a show cause notice u/s.271(1)(b) r.w.s.274 of the Act was issued on 29.10.2015 fixing the case for hearing on 05.11.2015. That on the given date, neither the assessee attended nor any reply was received from the assessee. During assessment proceedings also, notices u/s.143(2) and 142(1) of the Act was issued. However, on that date fixed for hearing i.e. 14.09.2015, the assessee has neither attended nor has furnished any written reply. The assessee has also neither attended nor filed any explanation in response to the show cause notice issued u/s.271(1)(b) r.w.s.274 of the Act. That due to all these non compliances by the assessee, the Assessing Officer, therefore, was satisfied that the assessee has committed default u/s.271(1)(b) of the Act and penalty was levied.

5.

At the time of hearing, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee referring to the paper book wherein as regards the date of hearing fixed on 14.09.2015 submitted that the assessee had sought an adjournment and therefore, it is the contention of the assessee that they have responded to the notice of the Department. However, when we peruse the penalty order, we find there is no mention in respect of these submissions of the assessee. Therefore, we are of the considered view, in the interest of justice, one more opportunity may be granted to the assessee so that he may justify his stand before the Assessing Officer and the Assessing Officer will decide the case after bringing on record all the submissions placed forth by the assessee while complying with the principles of natural justice.

In view thereof, we set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(Appeals) in all these appeals and restore the matters to the file of the Assessing Officer as indicated hereinabove.

6.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee in to 2758/PUN/2017 are allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on 2nd day of February, 2021.

More judgments on Section 271(1)(b)

All 2,912 judgments and leading authorities on Section 271(1)(b) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →