Search ITAT High Courts Landmark Cases

Search Supreme Court Landmark Cases Sections Phrases Insights AI Research History

Loading ITAT cases…

BharatTax.net

Income tax case law: ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) orders from every bench, with High Court and Supreme Court judgments.

Quick Links

Income Tax Case Law Search
Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments
Pricing
GST Case Laws

About

BharatTax makes Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders searchable for legal research. Searching is free, and a free account reads 10 full judgments a month.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved. · Privacy · Terms

ITAT Pune Judgments — July 2018 | BharatTax

Home/ITAT Judgments/Pune/2018/July

ITAT Pune Judgments — July 2018

181 orders · Page 1 of 4

BARAMATI AGRO LTD.,PUNE vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,

ITA 2497/PUN/2016[2012-13]Status: Disposed31 Jul 2018AY 2012-13Dismissed

The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal, as the revenue had no objection. The grounds raised by the assessee were dismissed as withdrawn.

INCOME TAX OFFICER, KOLHAPUR vs ABHAY NARAYAN POTDAR, KOLHAPUR

ITA 509/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2010-11Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs BELA VISHNU GUJRATHI, NASHIK

ITA 1911/PUN/2016[2009-10]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2009-10Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were deemed to be withdrawn or not pressed due to being filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular. The Revenue was granted liberty to approach for re-institution if exceptions applied.

INCOME-TAX OFFICER vs MALLIKARJUN CHANBASAPPA NADAGADALLI, KOLHAPUR

ITA 2536/PUN/2016[2010-11]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2010-11Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

INCOME TAX OFFICER vs SHANKAR GANPAT PANASKAR, NASHIK

ITA 208/PUN/2017[2011-12]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2011-12Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs AVESTA COMPUTERS PVT. LTD., PUNE

ITA 2072/PUN/2016[2010-11]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2010-11Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PUNE vs M/S. AAIJI SORBHI GROUP, PUNE

ITA 397/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2012-13Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 2, PUNE vs SMT. ASHWINI PRATAP PAWAR, PUNE

ITA 1792/PUN/2017[2013-14]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

INCOME-TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE-9, PUNE vs SHRI ANAND CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, PUNE

ITA 1663/PUN/2017[2013-14]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

INCOME-TAX OFFICER vs SHRI TUSHAR VIJAY SANKLECHA, NASHIK

ITA 1973/PUN/2016[2008-09]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2008-09Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs ARIHANT G. PATNI, PUNE

ITA 102/PUN/2017[2013-14]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

INCOME TAX OFFICER vs SHANKAR GANPAT PANASKAR, NASHIK

ITA 206/PUN/2017[2009-10]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2009-10Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLHAPUR vs M/S. SHREEM CONSTRUCTION, KOLHAPUR

ITA 875/PUN/2017[2007-08]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2007-08Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

INCOME TAX OFFICER, NASHIK vs M/S. SANGAM TRADING COMPANY, NASHIK

ITA 788/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2010-11Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs M/S. SUZLON ENERGY LTD., PUNE

ITA 2392/PUN/2016[2012-13 (26Q / Qrt. 4)]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

INCOME-TAX OFFICER vs SHRI BALASAHEB SADASHIV NIKAM, PUNE

ITA 2504/PUN/2016[2007-08]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2007-08Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

INCOME-TAX OFFICER vs M/S. R.L. GOLD PRIVATE LTD.,

ITA 2472/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2011-12Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs AESSEAL INDIA PVT. LTD., PUNE

ITA 2234/PUN/2016[2009-10]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2009-10Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD -3(2), PUNE vs SMT. BABITA SUNIL PARDESHI, PUNE

ITA 1740/PUN/2017[2013-14]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

INCOME-TAX OFFICER vs SMT. RADHIKA BALASAHEB NIKAM, PUNE

ITA 2505/PUN/2016[2007-08]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2007-08Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PUNE vs M/S. TRANTER INDIA PVT.LTD, PUNE

ITA 1279/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2012-13Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

INCOME-TAX OFFICER vs SHRI PUNIT AJIT SANKLECHA, NASHIK

ITA 1968/PUN/2016[2008-09]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2008-09Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs SHRI SHIVAJI ANANDRAO POWAR, KOLHAPUR

ITA 2430/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2011-12Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs SHRI SHIVAJI ANANDRAO POWAR, KOLHAPUR

ITA 2431/PUN/2016[2008-09]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2008-09Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PUNE vs RAJGURUNAGAR SAHAKARI BANK LTD., PUNE

ITA 1191/PUN/2017[2013-14]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PUNE vs M/S. MAYFAIR BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS, PUNE

ITA 1220/PUN/2017[2009-10]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2009-10Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 3, PUNE vs M/S. JOSHI SWEETS, PUNE

ITA 1838/PUN/2017[2013-14]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs M/S. SUZLON ENERGY LTD., PUNE

ITA 2401/PUN/2016[2015-16 (26Q / Qrt. 1)]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs M/S. HOTEL WOODLAND PVT.LTD, NASHIK

ITA 215/PUN/2017[2013-14]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs LOKMANGAL CO-OP. BANK LTD., SOLAPUR

ITA 1422/PUN/2016[2012-13]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2012-13Dismissed

The Tribunal held that accrued interest on NPAs is not taxable in the hands of the assessee, following the Bombay High Court's decision. The issue of amortization of premium on investments was also decided in favour of the assessee based on previous tribunal rulings.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs M/S. AUTO CARS, AURANGABAD

ITA 2845/PUN/2016[2012-13]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2012-13Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs VISHNU VITHALDAS GUJRATHI, NASHIK

ITA 1912/PUN/2016[2009-10]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2009-10Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were deemed to be withdrawn or not pressed due to being in contravention of the CBDT Circular regarding monetary limits for filing appeals. The Revenue was given liberty to approach for re-institution if exceptions applied.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs M/S. SUZLON ENERGY LTD., PUNE

ITA 2393/PUN/2016[2013-14 (26Q / Qrt. 1)]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs M/S. SUZLON ENERGY LTD., PUNE

ITA 2398/PUN/2016[2014-15 (26Q / Qrt. 2)]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were to be deemed withdrawn or not pressed due to contravention of the CBDT Circular regarding monetary limits for filing appeals. The Revenue was granted liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs M/S. SUZLON ENERGY LTD., PUNE

ITA 2396/PUN/2016[2013-14 (26Q / Qrt. 4)]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs DHARAMVIR SAMBHAJI URBAN CO-OP BANK LTD, PUNE

ITA 2651/PUN/2016[2012-13]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2012-13Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs SATYANARAYAN RAMSWAROOP AGARWAL, PUNE

ITA 2668/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2011-12Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs M/S. CREDIT POINTE SERVICES PVT.LTD, PUNE

ITA 2761/PUN/2016[2009-10]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2009-10Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were to be deemed withdrawn or not pressed due to being filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular. The Revenue was permitted to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs APOORVA PATNI, PUNE

ITA 2923/PUN/2016[2013-14]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

SATISH LACKAMICHAND AGARWAL,PUNE vs INCOME-TAX OFFICER,

ITA 930/PUN/2016[2010-11]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2010-11Remanded

The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) failed to provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee due to miscommunication regarding the address. Therefore, the matter was restored to the CIT(A) for a fresh hearing.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, AHMEDNAGAR CIRCLE, AHMEDNAGAR vs ASHOK SAHKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LIMITED, AHMEDNAGAR

ITA 1473/PUN/2017[2008-09]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2008-09Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

INCOME TAX OFFICER, PUNE vs UTTAMRAO HARIBHAU NIKAM, PUNE

ITA 646/PUN/2017[2008-09]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2008-09Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were deemed to be withdrawn or not pressed due to being filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular. The Revenue was granted liberty to approach for re-institution if exceptions applied.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PUNE vs M/S. EAGLE FLASKS INDUSTRIES LTD., PUNE

ITA 935/PUN/2017[1997-98]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 1997-98Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PUNE vs DHARAMVEER SAMBHAJI CO-OP. BANK LTD., PUNE

ITA 1189/PUN/2017[2013-14]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PANVEL CIRCLE, RAIGAD vs GORUR INFRA PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED, RAIGAD

ITA 1479/PUN/2017[2011-12]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2011-12Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

INCOME -TAX OFFICER, PUNE vs M/S. VAIBHAV METALS, PUNE

ITA 1265/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2012-13Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs M'S. PIYUSH ENTERPRISES, AURANGABAD

ITA 2216/PUN/2016[2009-10]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2009-10Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs AESSEAL INDIA PVT. LTD., PUNE

ITA 2235/PUN/2016[2010-11]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2010-11Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

INCOME TAX OFFICER, PUNE vs BAIF AGRO & BIO TECHNOLOGY PVT.LTD, PUNE

ITA 429/PUN/2017[2013-14]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs M/S. BHIMA RIDDHI INFOTAINMENT PVT.LTD, KOLHAPUR

ITA 2979/PUN/2016[2013-14]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2018AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal held that the appeals were filed in contravention of the CBDT Circular and were therefore deemed withdrawn or not pressed. The Revenue was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if exceptions applied.

Showing 1–50 of 181 · Page 1 of 4

← Prev12 3 4 Next →