ITAT Patna Judgments — October 2022

SMT JAYSHREE THAKUR,BHAGALPUR vs ITO, WARD-1(2), BHAGALPUR

ITA 55/PAT/2020[2010-11]Status: Heard13 Oct 2022AY 2010-11Remanded

The Tribunal found that the impugned orders were ex-parte and lacked detailed discussion on merits. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the orders and remitted them back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after providing the assessee with a proper opportunity of being heard and filing necessary documents.

SMT JAYSHREE THAKUR,BHAGALPUR vs ITO, WARD-1(2), BHAGALPUR

ITA 54/PAT/2020[2009-10]Status: Heard13 Oct 2022AY 2009-10Remanded

The Tribunal found that the impugned orders were ex-parte and lacked detailed discussion on merits. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the orders and remitted them back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after providing the assessee with a proper opportunity of being heard and filing necessary documents.

SMT JAYSHREE THAKUR,BHAGALPUR vs ITO, WARD-1(2), BHAGALPUR

ITA 52/PAT/2020[2007-08]Status: Heard13 Oct 2022AY 2007-08Remanded

The Tribunal found that the impugned orders were ex-parte and lacked detailed discussion on merits. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the orders and remitted them back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after providing the assessee with a proper opportunity of being heard and filing necessary documents.

SMT JAYSHREE THAKUR,BHAGALPUR vs ITO, WARD-1(2), BHAGALPUR

ITA 57/PAT/2020[2012-13]Status: Heard13 Oct 2022AY 2012-13Remanded

The Tribunal found that the impugned orders were ex-parte and lacked detailed discussion on merits. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the orders and remitted them back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after providing the assessee with a proper opportunity of being heard and filing necessary documents.

SMT JAYSHREE THAKUR,BHAGALPUR vs ITO, WARD-1(2), BHAGALPUR

ITA 56/PAT/2020[2011-12]Status: Heard13 Oct 2022AY 2011-12Remanded

The Tribunal found that the impugned orders were ex-parte and lacked detailed discussion on merits. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the orders and remitted them back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after providing the assessee with a proper opportunity of being heard and filing necessary documents.

SMT JAYSHREE THAKUR,BHAGALPUR vs ITO, WARD-1(2), BHAGALPUR

ITA 53/PAT/2020[2008-09]Status: Heard13 Oct 2022AY 2008-09Remanded

The Tribunal found that the impugned orders were ex-parte and lacked detailed discussion on merits. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the orders and remitted them back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after providing the assessee with a proper opportunity of being heard and filing necessary documents.

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA vs M/S SHIVAM EDUCATIONA TRUST, PATNA

ITA 73/PAT/2020[2011-12]Status: Heard5 Oct 2022AY 2011-12Dismissed

The Tribunal noted that the tax effect of the appeal was below the revised monetary limit set by the CBDT for filing appeals. Therefore, the appeal was treated as withdrawn or not pressed.