Loading ITAT cases…
139 orders · Page 2 of 3
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E was not permissible for statements processed under Section 200A before June 1, 2015, as there was no enabling provision for such a demand before the amendment. The Tribunal followed various High Court and ITAT decisions in favor of the assessee.