7 orders · Page 1 of 1
The Tribunal noted that the Revenue had no objection to the withdrawal of the appeals. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed both appeals as withdrawn.
The Tribunal noted that the Revenue had no objection to the withdrawal of the appeals. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed both appeals as withdrawn.
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had filed an application for withdrawal and the Revenue had no objection. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal set aside the ex parte orders of the CIT(A) due to a reasonable cause for non-appearance. The appeals were restored to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after providing the assessee with a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
The Tribunal set aside the ex parte orders of the CIT(A) due to a reasonable cause for non-appearance. The appeals were restored to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after providing the assessee with a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
The Tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable as it was filed against the policy decision of the Department, as per CBDT Circular No. 3/2018. The Tribunal noted that CBDT circulars are binding on the Revenue.
The Tribunal found that the assessee was not afforded a proper opportunity to present their case before the CIT(A). Therefore, the order of the CIT(A) was set aside.