Loading ITAT cases…
938 orders · Page 16 of 19
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessees' request to withdraw the appeals. The withdrawal was based on the assessees opting to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal has consigned the appeal to records and treated it as dismissed, subject to the condition that the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act. If unresolved, the assessee can approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessees' request to withdraw the appeals. The withdrawal was based on the assessees opting to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn in view of the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessees' request for withdrawal of the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn by the Tribunal.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The Senior DR had no objection to the withdrawal.
The Tribunal consigned the appeals to records and treated them as dismissed, subject to the condition that the assessee can seek reinstitution if the dispute is not resolved under the scheme.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn by the tribunal.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the Tribunal.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn by the tribunal.
The Tribunal noted the assessee's decision to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act and consequently dismissed the appeal. However, it allowed the assessee to seek reinstitution of the appeal if the dispute is not resolved under the Act.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal and ordered the appeal to be consigned to records and treated as dismissed. This dismissal is subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn based on the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn based on the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn based on the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal accepted the Revenue's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn in light of the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal acknowledged the assessee's request for withdrawal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed, with a caveat for reinstitution if the settlement fails.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal noted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The appeals were consigned to records and treated as dismissed, with a liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution if the dispute is not resolved under the scheme.
The Tribunal noted the assessee's decision to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act and consequently dismissed the appeal. This dismissal is subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.
The Tribunal consigned the appeals to records and treated them as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeals.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had passed an ex-parte order without sufficient opportunity for the assessee to be heard. Therefore, the matter was set aside to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The Departmental Representative had no objection to the withdrawal.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal noted the assessee's request for withdrawal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Consequently, the appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed. However, the assessee can approach the Tribunal for reinstitution if the dispute is not resolved under the scheme.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. This was based on the assessee opting to settle the tax arrears under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The ITAT held that the CIT(A) is required to pass a reasoned order on merit, even if the assessee is not represented. The ex-parte dismissal without deciding on merit was improper.