Loading ITAT cases…
938 orders · Page 13 of 19
The Tribunal consigned the appeal to records and treated it as dismissed, subject to the condition that the assessee can seek reinstitution if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The Senior Departmental Representative had no objection to the withdrawal.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeals. The Senior DR had no objection to the withdrawal.
The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal as they opted to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The tribunal accepted the request.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn in view of the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) was justified in allowing exemption under Section 10(26B) despite a typographical error in the return, as the claim was evident from the main schedule and supported by past and subsequent year's treatment. The cross-objection was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The assessee had opted to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the 'Vivad se Vishwash Scheme', the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeals. The Senior Departmental Representative had no objection to the withdrawal.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The Senior Departmental Representative had no objection to this request.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal noted the assessee's decision to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act and requested withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was accordingly consigned to records and treated as dismissed.
The Tribunal noted that similar issues were decided in favor of the assessee in earlier years by the Tribunal and High Court. For obsolescence of inventory, the matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for fresh determination based on net realizable value and precedents. The disallowance of advertisement and publicity expenses was dismissed.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal noted that similar issues were decided in favor of the assessee in earlier years by the Tribunal and High Court. For obsolescence of inventory, the matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for fresh determination based on net realizable value and precedents. The disallowance of advertisement and publicity expenses was dismissed.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn in view of the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had settled the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The Revenue's appeal was therefore dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn based on the assessee's settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The Senior DR had no objection to the withdrawal.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, granting liberty to the assessee to seek restoration if the dispute is not settled under the scheme. The Revenue had no objection to this condition.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal consigned the appeals to records and treated them as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeals.
The Tribunal consigned the appeals to records and treated them as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeals.
The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal as withdrawn, with the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwash Scheme, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as the assessee opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The assessee was granted liberty to revive the appeal if the dispute settlement fails.
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) is required to pass a reasoned order on merit, even in the absence of assessee's representation. The CIT(A)'s order was set aside for not deciding the appeal on merit.
The Tribunal dismissed all the appeals as withdrawn based on the assessee's statement about settling the dispute under the Vivaad Se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to revive the appeals if settlement failed for technical reasons.
The Tribunal dismissed all the appeals as withdrawn based on the assessee's statement about settling the dispute under the Vivaad Se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to revive the appeals if settlement failed for technical reasons.
The Tribunal dismissed all the appeals as withdrawn based on the assessee's statement about settling the dispute under the Vivaad Se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to revive the appeals if settlement failed for technical reasons.
The Tribunal dismissed all the appeals as withdrawn based on the assessee's statement about settling the dispute under the Vivaad Se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to revive the appeals if settlement failed for technical reasons.
The tribunal granted permission to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn because the matter was settled under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal as withdrawn, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the VSV scheme, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.
The Tribunal dismissed all the appeals as withdrawn based on the assessee's statement about settling the dispute under the Vivaad Se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to revive the appeals if settlement failed for technical reasons.
The Tribunal dismissed all the appeals as withdrawn based on the assessee's statement about settling the dispute under the Vivaad Se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to revive the appeals if settlement failed for technical reasons.
The Tribunal dismissed all the appeals as withdrawn based on the assessee's statement about settling the dispute under the Vivaad Se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to revive the appeals if settlement failed for technical reasons.
The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal as withdrawn. However, it allowed the assessee to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's application to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn based on the settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The dismissal is conditional, allowing the assessee to approach the Tribunal for re-institution if the settlement under the scheme is not finalized.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the VSV scheme, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.
The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal as withdrawn, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the VSV scheme, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.