Showing 40 of 5,125 orders. Use the months below for the rest.
- M/S. Ubitech Private Limited, Faridabad vs Addl.CIT, Faridabad
ITA 2414/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: Disposed30 Dec 2016AY 2009-10
- M/S. Living Media India Limited, New Delhi vs ACIT, New Delhi
ITA 1553/DEL/2014[2006-07]Status: Disposed30 Dec 2016AY 2006-07
- M/S. Living Media India Limited, New Delhi vs ACIT, New Delhi
ITA 1554/DEL/2014[2007-08]Status: Disposed30 Dec 2016AY 2007-08
- ITO, New Delhi vs M/S. Rancure Investment Pvt. Ltd., Delhi
ITA 6099/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: Disposed30 Dec 2016AY 2009-10Dismissed
The Tribunal held that the assessee had discharged its initial burden under Section 68 by submitting confirmations, IT returns, bank statements, and affidavits of all 17 parties. Since the assessee expressed inability to produce the directors, the AO issued notices under Section 133(6), which were complied with by the creditors, thus negating the need for the assessee to produce them. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s decision that merely because cash was deposited in the bank accounts of other parties/shareholders prior to issuing cheques to the assessee company, it could not be concluded that they were not creditworthy. The creditworthiness is not solely determined by cash deposits or nominal income shown in returns; it is also governed by investments and balance sheet size. The assessee had provided a detailed chart showing fund availability with these companies, and the AO had not produced evidence that the invested amounts were not owned by these companies or belonged to the assessee. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A) that in the absence of evidence suggesting the transactions were not genuine, the AO could not treat the invested amount as the assessee's income under Section 68. The Revenue's grounds of appeal were dismissed.
- DCIT, New Delhi vs M/S. Bihariji Ispat Udyog Ltd., New Delhi
ITA 418/DEL/2014[2007-08]Status: Disposed30 Dec 2016AY 2007-08
- DCIT, New Delhi vs M/S. Living Media Ltd., New Delhi
ITA 2289/DEL/2014[2006-07]Status: Disposed30 Dec 2016AY 2006-07
- Smt. Naina Kapur, New Delhi vs ACIT, New Delhi
ITA 6438/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: Disposed30 Dec 2016AY 2009-10
- ITO, New Delhi vs M/S. Khanna Pharma, New Delhi
ITA 6415/DEL/2012[2009-10]Status: Disposed30 Dec 2016AY 2009-10
- DCIT, New Delhi vs M/S Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd., New Delhi
ITA 827/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: Disposed30 Dec 2016AY 2009-10
- DCIT, New Delhi vs M/S. Living Media Ltd., New Delhi
ITA 2290/DEL/2014[2007-08]Status: Disposed30 Dec 2016AY 2007-08
- M/S. Lakhani Footwear Pvt. Ltd., Faridabad vs ACIT, New Delhi
ITA 1502/DEL/2014[2010-11]Status: Disposed30 Dec 2016AY 2010-11
- M/S. Aadi International, New Delhi vs DCIT, New Delhi
ITA 6612/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: Disposed30 Dec 2016AY 2009-10
- ACIT, New Delhi vs M/S. Jubiliant Energy Kharsang Pvt. Ltd…
ITA 5384/DEL/2011[2008-09]Status: Disposed30 Dec 2016AY 2008-09
- ACIT, New Delhi vs M/S. Aadi International, New Delhi
ITA 6583/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: Disposed30 Dec 2016AY 2009-10
- DCIT, New Delhi vs M/S Bses Yamuna Power Ltd., Delhi
ITA 828/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: Disposed30 Dec 2016AY 2009-10
- ACIT, New Delhi vs M/S. Jay Bee Industries, New Delhi
ITA 1562/DEL/2014[2010-11]Status: Disposed30 Dec 2016AY 2010-11
- Smt. Prit Pal Kaur, Roorkee vs ITO, Roorkee
ITA 2154/DEL/2016[2007-08]Status: Disposed29 Dec 2016AY 2007-08
- Shri Pawan Ojha, Uttar Pradesh vs ACIT, Noida
ITA 4987/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: Disposed29 Dec 2016AY 2012-13Remanded
The ITAT held that the CIT(A)'s order was bad in law and against the principles of natural justice as it did not address the issues on merits. The tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the matter for a fresh decision.
- Alexander Athletic Club, Meerut vs ACIT, Meerut
ITA 1537/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: Disposed29 Dec 2016AY 2012-13Remanded
The Tribunal found that the tax authorities had not adequately addressed the factual submissions of the assessee regarding the nature of receipts and the club's past history. Therefore, the impugned order was set aside.
- ITO, New Delhi vs M/S. Abrol India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi
ITA 4482/DEL/2016[2007-08]Status: Disposed29 Dec 2016AY 2007-08Dismissed
The Tribunal held that the CBDT circular revising the monetary limit for filing appeals to the Tribunal with retrospective effect was applicable. As the tax effect in this appeal was below the prescribed limit, the appeal was not maintainable.
- Rj Aqua Food Pvt. Ltd., Dehradun vs ACIT, Dehradun
ITA 4991/DEL/2016[2010-11]Status: Disposed29 Dec 2016AY 2010-11
- Smt. Tarun Kalra, Roorkee vs ITO, Roorkee
ITA 2148/DEL/2016[2007-08]Status: Disposed29 Dec 2016AY 2007-08Dismissed
The Tribunal presumed the assessee was not serious in pursuing the appeals due to repeated non-appearance. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed in limine.
- DCIT, New Delhi vs M/S. Greater Ashoka Land & Development Co…
ITA 2917/DEL/2014[2005-06]Status: Disposed29 Dec 2016AY 2005-06
- M/S Leelavati Somany Education Trust, Rewari vs ACIT, Rewari
ITA 2565/DEL/2016[2010-11]Status: Disposed29 Dec 2016AY 2010-11Dismissed
The Tribunal observed that the assessee was not serious in pursuing the appeal due to repeated non-appearance. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed in limine.
- Smt. Tarun Kalra, Roorkee vs ITO, Roorkee
ITA 2149/DEL/2016[2008-09]Status: Disposed29 Dec 2016AY 2008-09Dismissed
The Tribunal presumed the assessee was not serious in pursuing the appeals due to repeated non-appearance. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed in limine.
- Smt. Manju Mittal, New Delhi vs ITO, Meerut
ITA 6009/DEL/2015[2005-06]Status: Disposed29 Dec 2016AY 2005-06Remanded
The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) and restored the issue back to the CIT(A) for de novo decision. The CIT(A) was directed to follow procedural requirements, issue notice, and pass a speaking order after hearing the assessee.
- Smt. Prit Pal Kaur, Roorkee vs ITO, Roorkee
ITA 2155/DEL/2016[2008-09]Status: Disposed29 Dec 2016AY 2008-09
- Shri Bhupinderjit Singh Sawhney, New Delhi vs ITO, New Delhi
ITA 3572/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: Disposed29 Dec 2016AY 2010-11Dismissed
The Tribunal presumed the assessee was not serious in pursuing the appeal due to repeated adjournments and failure to cure defects. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed in limine.
- Mr. Dharam Pal Singh, Noida vs ITO, Noida
ITA 4545/DEL/2016[2008-09]Status: Disposed29 Dec 2016AY 2008-09Remanded
The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) and remanded the case back. The CIT(A) was directed to adjudicate the issue of cost of acquisition and the applicability of Section 50C by passing a speaking order after considering fresh evidence if necessary.
- Smt. Prit Pal Kaur, Roorkee vs ITO, Roorkee
ITA 2153/DEL/2016[2006-07]Status: Disposed29 Dec 2016AY 2006-07Dismissed
The Tribunal held that the assessee was not serious in pursuing the appeals due to repeated non-appearance. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed in limine.
- ADIT(E), New Delhi vs M/S. Indian Institute of Social…
ITA 1413/DEL/2014[2007-08]Status: Disposed29 Dec 2016AY 2007-08
- ITO, Rewari vs Sh. Phool Singh, Rewari
ITA 3018/DEL/2014[2007-08]Status: Disposed29 Dec 2016AY 2007-08Dismissed
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, finding that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence for the source of investment and agricultural income. The Revenue failed to present contrary facts or evidence to challenge the CIT(A)'s findings.
- ADIT(E), New Delhi vs Indian Institute for Social Developent, New…
ITA 5250/DEL/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed29 Dec 2016AY 2007-08
- Raj Kumar Sharma, Ghaziabad vs ITO, Ghaziabad
ITA 1793/DEL/2015[2009-10]Status: Disposed28 Dec 2016AY 2009-10
- Smt. Savita, Gurgaon vs ITO, Rewari
ITA 2642/DEL/2016[2006-07]Status: Disposed28 Dec 2016AY 2006-07
- M/S. Mathur Imports & Exports Pvt. Ltd… vs ITO, New Delhi
ITA 2923/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: Disposed28 Dec 2016AY 2009-10Dismissed
The Tribunal presumed the assessee was not serious in pursuing the appeal due to non-representation. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed in limine.
- Bhupinder Singh Kochar, New Delhi vs DCIT, New Delhi
ITA 6085/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: Disposed28 Dec 2016AY 2009-10
- ITO, New Delhi vs Sh. Dilbar Hussain, New Delhi
ITA 1327/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: Disposed28 Dec 2016AY 2009-10
- M/S. Bharti Enterprises, New Delhi vs JCIT, New Delhi
ITA 1161/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: Disposed28 Dec 2016AY 2009-10
- M/S. Bla- Mk(Jv), New Delhi vs ITO, New Delhi
ITA 2190/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: Disposed28 Dec 2016AY 2009-10
