Loading ITAT cases…
12 orders · Page 1 of 1
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as infructuous.
The ITAT found that the CIT(A) did not pass a speaking order and dismissed the appeal summarily. The matter was restored to the CIT(A) with directions to pass a speaking order following principles of natural justice.
The ITAT found that the CIT(A) did not pass a speaking order and dismissed the appeal summarily. The matter was restored to the CIT(A) with directions to pass a speaking order following principles of natural justice.
The ITAT found that the CIT(A) did not pass a speaking order and dismissed the appeal summarily. The matter was restored to the CIT(A) with directions to pass a speaking order following principles of natural justice.
The Tribunal held that the services provided by the assessee were intrinsically linked to mining or like projects and thus excluded from the definition of FTS under Section 9(1)(vii). Consequently, the receipts were taxable under Section 44BB of the Act.
The Tribunal held that the notices issued under Section 148 were barred by limitation. Following the Delhi High Court's decision in Brahma Datt Vs ACIT, the Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings.
The Tribunal held that the notices issued under Section 148 were barred by limitation. Following the Delhi High Court's decision in Brahma Datt Vs ACIT, the Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings.
The Tribunal held that the notices issued under Section 148 were barred by limitation. Following the Delhi High Court's decision in Brahma Datt Vs ACIT, the Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings.
The Tribunal held that the notices issued under Section 148 were barred by limitation. Following the Delhi High Court's decision in Brahma Datt Vs ACIT, the Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings.
The Tribunal held that the notices issued under Section 148 were barred by limitation. Following the Delhi High Court's decision in Brahma Datt Vs ACIT, the Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings.
The Tribunal held that the notices issued under Section 148 were barred by limitation. Following the Delhi High Court's decision in Brahma Datt Vs ACIT, the Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings.
The Tribunal held that the notices issued under Section 148 were barred by limitation. Following the Delhi High Court's decision in Brahma Datt Vs ACIT, the Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings.