ITAT Dehradun Judgments — August 2020

MAHABIR SINGH PUNDIR,DEHRADUN vs ITO, WARD- 1(5), DEHRADUN

ITA 125/DDN/2019[2014-15]Status: Disposed18 Aug 2020AY 2014-15Dismissed

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had filed the necessary declaration under the Vivad se Vishwas Act. Consequently, the appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed.

KAUSHAL SHARMA,HARIDWAR vs DCIT, CIRCLE- 29 & 30, HARIDWAR

ITA 3856/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: Disposed18 Aug 2020AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal consigned the appeal to records and treated it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.

ANIL KUMAR ADLAKHA,DEHRADUN vs ITO, WARD- 1(1), DEHRADUN

ITA 3987/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: Disposed18 Aug 2020AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had filed a declaration under the Vivad se Vishwas Act. Therefore, the appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed.

CHITTAR MAL & CO.,ROORKEE vs ITO, WARD-1(3)(4), ROORKEE

ITA 2205/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: Disposed18 Aug 2020AY 2014-15Dismissed

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had filed a declaration under the Vivad se Vishwas Act. Consequently, the appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed, subject to the condition that it could be reinstituted if the dispute was not resolved under the Act.

SH. SATYENDRA KUMAR TYAGI,HARIDWAR vs DCIT, HARIDWAR

ITA 2236/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: Disposed18 Aug 2020AY 2012-13Dismissed

The Tribunal consigned the appeal to records and treated it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.

SHREE SIDHBALI INDUSTRIES LTD.,KOTDWAR vs DCIT, CIRCLE- 1(4)(1), RISHIKESH

ITA 4754/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed18 Aug 2020AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal consigned the appeal to records and treated it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.

MURTI RAM BELWAL,TEHRI GARHWAL vs ITO, WARD- 1(4)(5), TEHRI GARHWAL

ITA 4761/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed18 Aug 2020AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal consigned the appeal to records and treated it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.

JASWANT KUMAR SHARMA,DEHRADUN vs ITO, WARD-1(4), DEHRADUN

ITA 5590/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: Disposed18 Aug 2020AY 2014-15Dismissed

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had filed a declaration under the Vivad se Vishwas Act. Consequently, the appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed.

YAMIN CONTRACTOR,ROORKEE vs ITO, WARD-1(3)(5), ROORKEE

ITA 121/DDN/2019[2015-16]Status: Disposed18 Aug 2020AY 2015-16Dismissed

The Tribunal consigned the appeal to records and treated it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.

M/S. LORD VISHWA KARMA HEAT EXCHANGERS PVT. LTD.,HARIDWAR vs DCIT, HARIDWAR

ITA 963/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: Disposed18 Aug 2020AY 2012-13

PANKAJ NAGALIA,DEHRADUN vs ACIT, CIRCLE-2, DEHRADUN

ITA 1174/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2014-15Dismissed

The Tribunal decided to consign the appeal to records and treat it as dismissed, subject to the condition that the assessee can approach for reinstitution if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act.

CUBRA CONSTRUCTION CO.P.LTD,RISHIKESH vs DCIT, CIRCLE-1(4)(1), RISHIKESH

ITA 2211/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal consigned the appeal to records and treated it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.

MANJU GHAI,DEHRADUN vs ITO, WARD-1(5), DEHRADUN

ITA 2628/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2014-15Dismissed

The Tribunal decided to consign the appeal to records and treat it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.

AJEET KUMAR BHARGAVA,HARIDWAR vs ITO, WARD-1(3)(1), HARIDWAR

ITA 122/DDN/2019[2013-14]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal decided to consign the appeal to records and treat it as dismissed, subject to the condition that the assessee can seek reinstitution if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act.

AJEET KUMAR BHARGAVA,HARIDWAR vs ITO, WARD-1(3)(1), HARIDWAR

ITA 123/DDN/2019[2014-15]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2014-15Dismissed

The Tribunal decided to consign the appeal to records and treat it as dismissed, subject to the condition that the assessee can seek reinstitution if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act.

AJEET KUMAR BHARGAVA,HARIDWAR vs ITO, WARD-1(3)(1), HARIDWAR

ITA 124/DDN/2019[2015-16]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2015-16Dismissed

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Act. Therefore, the appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed, subject to the condition that it could be reinstituted if the settlement was not ultimately resolved.

KASHYAP KUMAR,DEHRADUN vs DCIT, CIRCLE- 1, DEHRADUN

ITA 126/DDN/2019[2015-16]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2015-16Dismissed

The Tribunal decided to consign the appeal to records and treat it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.

ANITA BARGOTI,HARIDWAR vs ITO), WARD-1(3)(1), HARIDWAR

ITA 135/DDN/2019[2013-14]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal decided to consign the appeal to records and treat it as dismissed, subject to the condition that the dispute is resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act.

CHANDRA SHAKHAR WALIA,HARIDWAR vs ITO, WARD-1(3)(1), HARIDWAR

ITA 136/DDN/2019[2012-13]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2012-13Dismissed

The Tribunal decided to consign the appeal to records and treat it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.

DEVENDRA KUMAR & SONS (HUF),HARIDWAR vs ITO WARD 1(3)(1), HARIDWAR

ITA 3477/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2014-15Dismissed

The Tribunal consigned the appeal to records and treated it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.

SANTOSH,HARIDWAR vs ITO WARD 1(3)(3), HARIDWAR

ITA 3478/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2014-15Dismissed

The Tribunal decided to consign the appeal to records and treat it as dismissed, subject to the condition that the dispute is resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act.

BHANWAR KALI,HARIDWAR vs ITO WARD 1(3)(1), HARIDWAR

ITA 3479/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2014-15Dismissed

The Tribunal consigned the appeal to records and treated it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.

BABITA,HARIDWAR vs ITO WARD 01(3)(1), HARIDWAR

ITA 3480/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2014-15Dismissed

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had filed the necessary declaration under the Vivad se Vishwas Act. Consequently, the appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed.

PREM LUTHRA,HARIDWAR vs DCIT CIRCLE, HARIDWAR

ITA 3481/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2014-15Dismissed

The Tribunal decided to consign the appeal to records and treat it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.

GULSHAN KUMAR,HARIDWAR vs ITO WARD 1(3)(1), HARIDWAR

ITA 3482/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2015-16Dismissed

The Tribunal has consigned the appeal to records and treated it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.

AMIT JAIN HUF,HARIDWAR vs ITO WARD-1(3)(1), HARIDWAR

ITA 55/DDN/2019[2015-16]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2015-16Dismissed

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Act. Consequently, the appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed.

NEETA MEHRA,HARIDWAR vs DCIT CIRCLE, HARIDWAR

ITA 56/DDN/2019[2015-16]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2015-16Dismissed

The Tribunal decided to consign the appeal to records and treat it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.

RITU TECH,HARIDWAR vs DCIT CIRCLE, HARIDWAR

ITA 57/DDN/2019[2015-16]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2015-16Dismissed

The Tribunal consigned the appeal to records and treated it as dismissed, subject to the assessee's liberty to seek reinstitution if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act.

SANTOSH RANI GOEL,HARIDWAR vs ITO WARD 1(3)(3), HARIDWAR

ITA 59/DDN/2019[2015-16]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2015-16Dismissed

The Tribunal decided to consign the appeal to records and treat it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.

SHIKHA SHARMA,ROORKEE vs ITO WARD-1(3)(5), ROORKEE

ITA 61/DDN/2019[2015-16]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2015-16Dismissed

The Tribunal decided to consign the appeal to records and treat it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.

PRABHAT KUMAR & SONS HUF,HARIDWAR vs ITO, WARD-1(3)(2), HARIDWAR

ITA 639/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2014-15Dismissed

The Tribunal has consigned the appeals to records and treated them as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeals.

PRABHAT KUMAR,HARIDWAR vs ITO WARD-1(3)(2) HARIDWAR, HARIDWAR

ITA 640/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2015-16Dismissed

The Tribunal has consigned the appeals to records and treated them as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeals.

SANJAY JAIN AND SONS KARTA,HARIDWAR vs ITO WARD 1(3)(3), HARIDWAR

ITA 58/DDN/2019[2015-16]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2015-16Dismissed

The Tribunal decided to consign the appeal to records and treat it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.

HIMGIRI ISPAT PVT. LTD.,KOTDWAR vs ITO, KOTDWAR

ITA 2775/DEL/2018[2011-12]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2011-12Dismissed

The Tribunal consigned the appeal to records and treated it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.

PANKAJ NAGALIA,DEHRADUN vs ACIT, CIRCLE- 2, DEHRADUN

ITA 2776/DEL/2018[2006-07]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2006-07Dismissed

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had filed a declaration under the Vivad se Vishwas Act. Consequently, the appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed, subject to the condition that it could be revived if the settlement under the Act was not finalized.

MONIKA JAIN,HARIDWAR vs DCIT, CIRCLE- 1(3)(1), HARIDWAR

ITA 4538/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Act. Consequently, the appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed, subject to the condition that it could be reinstituted if the settlement was not finalized.

GULNAZ KHANAM,HARIDWAR vs DCIT, CIRCLE-1(3)(1), HARIDWAR

ITA 4957/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2015-16Dismissed

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Act. Consequently, the appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed, subject to the condition that it could be reinstituted if the settlement was not finalized.

MANOJ MAKIN,DEHRADUN vs ITO, WARD-1(5), DEHRADUN

ITA 8114/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2014-15Dismissed

The Tribunal decided to consign the appeal to records and treat it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.

DISHI JAIN,HARIDWAR vs ITO, WARD-1(3)(1), HARIDWAR

ITA 120/DDN/2019[2015-16]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2015-16Dismissed

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Act. Therefore, the appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed, subject to the condition that it could be reinstituted if the settlement was not ultimately resolved.

GURJEET SINGH,DEHRADUN vs ITO, DEHRADUN

ITA 3398/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2011-12Dismissed

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had filed the necessary declaration under the Vivad se Vishwas Act. Consequently, the appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed.

SHRI SUSHIL KUMAR,UTTRAKHAND vs ITO, RISHIKESH

ITA 846/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2011-12Dismissed

The Tribunal decided to consign the appeal to records and treat it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.

JITENDER SINGH,HARIDWAR vs DCIT, CIRCLE, HARDWAR

ITA 5472/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2020AY 2014-15Dismissed

The Tribunal consigned the appeal to records and treated it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.