Loading ITAT cases…
324 orders · Page 7 of 7
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing liberty to the assessees to restore them if their application under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme is rejected. The Tribunal also clarified the consequences of opting out or misrepresentation under the scheme.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing liberty to the assessees to restore them if their application under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme is rejected. The Tribunal also clarified the consequences of opting out or misrepresentation under the scheme.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing liberty to the assessees to restore them if their application under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme is rejected. The Tribunal also clarified the consequences of opting out or misrepresentation under the scheme.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing liberty to the assessees to restore them if their application under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme is rejected. The Tribunal also clarified the consequences of opting out or misrepresentation under the scheme.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing liberty to the assessees to restore them if their application under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme is rejected. The Tribunal also clarified the consequences of opting out or misrepresentation under the scheme.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing the assessees to utilize the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if the scheme application was rejected.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing the assessees to utilize the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if the scheme application was rejected.
The Tribunal noted the assessees' intention to utilize the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and, following a High Court precedent, dismissed the appeals as withdrawn. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if the scheme application was rejected.
The Tribunal noted that the assessees intended to settle their disputes under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and, following a similar High Court order, dismissed the appeals as withdrawn. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if the scheme application was rejected.
The Tribunal noted that the assessees intended to settle their disputes under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and, following a similar High Court order, dismissed the appeals as withdrawn. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if the scheme application was rejected.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing liberty to restore them if the application under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme is rejected. The Tribunal also clarified the revival of proceedings if the assessee opts out or misrepresents facts.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing liberty to restore them if the application under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme is rejected. The Tribunal also clarified the revival of proceedings if the assessee opts out or misrepresents facts.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing liberty to restore them if the application under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme is rejected. The Tribunal also clarified the revival of proceedings if the assessee opts out or misrepresents facts.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing liberty to restore them if the application under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme is rejected. The Tribunal also clarified the revival of proceedings if the assessee opts out or misrepresents facts.
The Tribunal, following the jurisdictional High Court's decision, dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to restore them if the 'Vivad se Vishwas' application is rejected. The Tribunal also clarified the consequences of opting out or misrepresentation under the scheme.
The Tribunal, following the jurisdictional High Court's decision, dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to restore them if the 'Vivad se Vishwas' application is rejected. The Tribunal also clarified the consequences of opting out or misrepresentation under the scheme.
The Tribunal, following the jurisdictional High Court's decision, dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to restore them if the 'Vivad se Vishwas' application is rejected. The Tribunal also clarified the consequences of opting out or misrepresentation under the scheme.
The Tribunal, following the jurisdictional High Court's decision, dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to restore them if the 'Vivad se Vishwas' application is rejected. The Tribunal also clarified the consequences of opting out or misrepresentation under the scheme.
The Tribunal noted that the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' allows for the settlement of direct tax disputes. Following a similar High Court order, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to restore them if the scheme application is rejected.
The Tribunal noted that the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' allows for the settlement of direct tax disputes. Following a similar High Court order, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to restore them if the scheme application is rejected.
The Tribunal noted that the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' allows for the settlement of direct tax disputes. Following a similar High Court order, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to restore them if the scheme application is rejected.
The Tribunal noted that the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' allows for the settlement of direct tax disputes. Following a similar High Court order, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to restore them if the scheme application is rejected.
The Tribunal noted that the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' allows for the settlement of direct tax disputes. Following a High Court precedent, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to restore them if the scheme application is rejected.
The ITAT set aside the order of the CIT(A) and remitted the matter back for a fresh adjudication. The assessee was directed to appear before the CIT(A) to present her case.