ITAT Chennai Judgments — January 2021

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, following the precedent set by the Madras High Court regarding the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if the scheme application is rejected.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, following the precedent set by the Madras High Court regarding the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if the scheme application is rejected.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, following the precedent set by the Madras High Court regarding the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if the scheme application is rejected.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, following the precedent set by the Madras High Court regarding the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if the scheme application is rejected.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing the assessees to utilize the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme'. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if the scheme application was rejected.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing the assessees to utilize the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme'. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if the scheme application was rejected.

The Tribunal noted that the assessees intended to utilize the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' to settle their tax disputes. Following a similar decision by the Madras High Court, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn.

The Tribunal noted that the assessees intended to utilize the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' to settle their tax disputes. Following a similar decision by the Madras High Court, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing the assessees to utilize the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if their applications under the scheme were rejected.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing the assessees to utilize the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if the scheme application is rejected.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing the assessees to utilize the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if the scheme application is rejected.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing the assessees to utilize the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if the scheme application is rejected.

The Tribunal, following the precedent set by the Madras High Court, dismissed the appeals as withdrawn. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if the 'Vivad se Vishwas' application was rejected.

The Tribunal, following the precedent set by the Madras High Court, dismissed the appeals as withdrawn. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if the 'Vivad se Vishwas' application was rejected.

The Tribunal, following the precedent set by the Madras High Court, dismissed the appeals as withdrawn. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if the 'Vivad se Vishwas' application was rejected.

The Tribunal, following the precedent set by the Madras High Court, dismissed the appeals as withdrawn. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if the 'Vivad se Vishwas' application was rejected.

The Tribunal, following the precedent set by the Madras High Court, dismissed the appeals as withdrawn. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if the 'Vivad se Vishwas' application was rejected.

The Tribunal, following the decision of the Madras High Court, dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to the assessees to restore them if their applications under the scheme are rejected.

The Tribunal, following the decision of the Madras High Court, dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to the assessees to restore them if their applications under the scheme are rejected.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing liberty to the assessees to restore them if their applications under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme are rejected. The decision was based on a similar High Court ruling.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing liberty to the assessees to restore them if their applications under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme are rejected. The decision was based on a similar High Court ruling.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing liberty to the assessees to restore them if their applications under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme are rejected. The decision was based on a similar High Court ruling.

The Tribunal noted that the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' allows for the settlement of direct tax disputes. Following a High Court precedent, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to restore them if the scheme application is rejected.

The Tribunal noted that the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' allows for the settlement of direct tax disputes. Following a High Court precedent, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to restore them if the scheme application is rejected.

The Tribunal noted that the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' allows for the settlement of direct tax disputes. Following a High Court precedent, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to restore them if the scheme application is rejected.

The Tribunal noted that the assessees intended to utilize the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' to settle disputes. Following a precedent from the Madras High Court, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to restore them if the scheme application is rejected.

The Tribunal noted that the assessees intended to utilize the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' to settle disputes. Following a precedent from the Madras High Court, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to restore them if the scheme application is rejected.

The Tribunal noted that the assessees intended to utilize the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' to settle disputes. Following a precedent from the Madras High Court, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to restore them if the scheme application is rejected.

The Tribunal noted that the assessees intended to utilize the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' to settle disputes. Following a precedent from the Madras High Court, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to restore them if the scheme application is rejected.

The Tribunal noted that the assessees intended to utilize the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' to settle disputes. Following a precedent from the Madras High Court, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to restore them if the scheme application is rejected.

The Tribunal noted that the assessees intended to utilize the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' to settle disputes. Following a precedent from the Madras High Court, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to restore them if the scheme application is rejected.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing the assessees to utilize the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if their applications under the scheme were rejected.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing the assessees to utilize the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if their applications under the scheme were rejected.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing the assessees to utilize the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if their applications under the scheme were rejected.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing the assessees to utilize the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if their applications under the scheme were rejected.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing the assessees to utilize the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if their applications under the scheme were rejected.

The Tribunal, following a decision of the Madras High Court, dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing liberty to restore them if the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' application is rejected. The Tribunal clarified the consequences of opting out or misrepresentation under the scheme.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, following the precedent set by the Madras High Court. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if the application under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme is rejected by the designated authority.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, following the precedent set by the Madras High Court. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if the application under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme is rejected by the designated authority.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, following the precedent set by the Madras High Court. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if the application under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme is rejected by the designated authority.

The Tribunal noted that the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' allows for the settlement of direct tax disputes. Following a similar decision by the Madras High Court, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to the assessees to restore them if their applications under the scheme are rejected.

The Tribunal noted that the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' allows for the settlement of direct tax disputes. Following a similar decision by the Madras High Court, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to the assessees to restore them if their applications under the scheme are rejected.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing the assessees to restore them if their application under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme is rejected. The Tribunal also clarified the consequences of opting out or misrepresentation under the scheme.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing the assessees to restore them if their application under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme is rejected. The Tribunal also clarified the consequences of opting out or misrepresentation under the scheme.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, following a High Court decision, allowing liberty to restore the appeals if the Vivad se Vishwas application is rejected. The Tribunal also clarified the consequences if the Revenue had filed appeals or if assessees misrepresented facts.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, following a High Court decision, allowing liberty to restore the appeals if the Vivad se Vishwas application is rejected. The Tribunal also clarified the consequences if the Revenue had filed appeals or if assessees misrepresented facts.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, following a High Court decision, allowing liberty to restore the appeals if the Vivad se Vishwas application is rejected. The Tribunal also clarified the consequences if the Revenue had filed appeals or if assessees misrepresented facts.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, following a High Court decision, allowing liberty to restore the appeals if the Vivad se Vishwas application is rejected. The Tribunal also clarified the consequences if the Revenue had filed appeals or if assessees misrepresented facts.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing the assessees to utilize the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if their applications under the scheme were rejected.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, allowing the assessees to utilize the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to restore the appeals if their applications under the scheme were rejected.