101 tribunal orders from the Amritsar bench in 2020.
Showing 40 of 101 orders. Use the months below for the rest.
The assessee sought to withdraw the appeals to avail the Vivad se Vishwas scheme. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
The Tribunal acknowledged the assessee's lack of diligence but, considering the CIT(E) did not decide on merits, remanded the case back. The assessee was granted a fresh opportunity to be heard, provided they cooperate fully.
The Tribunal allowed the assessees to withdraw their appeals. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal of these appeals.
The Tribunal allowed the assessees to withdraw their appeals. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal of these appeals.
The assessee sought to withdraw the appeals to avail the Vivad se Vishwas scheme. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
The Tribunal allowed the assessees' appeals to be dismissed as withdrawn. The Revenue did not raise any objection to this course of action.
The Tribunal allowed the assessees' appeals to be dismissed as withdrawn. The Revenue did not raise any objection to this course of action.
The Tribunal noted the assessee's lack of participation but also observed that the CIT(E) did not decide the application on merits. Therefore, the case was remanded for a fresh decision.
The assessee sought to withdraw the appeals to avail the Vivad se Vishwas scheme. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
The Tribunal allowed the assessees to withdraw their appeals. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal of these appeals.
The Tribunal held that the rejection of the registration application violated the principles of natural justice as the assessee was not given a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The order of the CIT(E) was set aside.
The Tribunal allowed the assessees to withdraw their appeals. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal of these appeals.
The Tribunal held that the assessee was not provided with proper and reasonable opportunities to be heard, violating the principles of natural justice. Therefore, the impugned order was set aside.
The Tribunal allowed the assessees' appeals to be dismissed as withdrawn. The Revenue did not raise any objection to this course of action.
The assessee sought to withdraw the appeals to avail the Vivad se Vishwas scheme. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
The Tribunal allowed the assessees' appeals to be dismissed as withdrawn. The Revenue did not raise any objection to this course of action.
The tribunal allowed the assessees' appeals to be dismissed as withdrawn. This was based on the assessees having availed the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and received Form No. 3/5 from the Income Tax Department.
The tribunal allowed the assessees' appeals to be dismissed as withdrawn. This was based on the assessees having availed the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and received Form No. 3/5 from the Income Tax Department.
The tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. This was based on the assessee availing the Vivad se Vishwas scheme and the department issuing a certificate in response.
The tribunal allowed the assessees' appeals to be dismissed as withdrawn. This was based on the assessees having availed the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and received Form No. 3/5 from the Income Tax Department.
The tribunal allowed the assessees' appeals to be dismissed as withdrawn. This was based on the assessees having availed the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and received Form No. 3/5 from the Income Tax Department.
The tribunal allowed the assessee's appeals to be withdrawn as the assessee had availed the Vivad se Vishwas scheme and received certificates under the scheme. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
The tribunal allowed the assessees' appeals to be dismissed as withdrawn. This was based on the assessees having availed the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and received Form No. 3/5 from the Income Tax Department.
The tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeals as the assessees had availed the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and received Form No. 3/5 from the Income Tax Department.
The tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeals as the assessees had availed the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and obtained certificates from the Income Tax Department.
The tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeals as the assessees had availed the Vivad Se Vishwas immunity scheme and received Form No. 3/5.
The tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeals as the assessees had availed the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and obtained certificates from the Income Tax Department.
The tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeals as the assessees had availed the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and obtained certificates from the Income Tax Department.
The tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeals as the assessees had availed the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and received Form No. 3/5 from the Income Tax Department.
The tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeals as the assessees had availed the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and obtained certificates from the Income Tax Department.
The tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeals as the assessees had availed the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and obtained certificates from the Income Tax Department.
The tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeals as the assessees had availed the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and obtained certificates from the Income Tax Department.
The tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeals as the assessees had availed the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and obtained certificates from the Income Tax Department.
The Tribunal held that the provisions for levying late fees under Section 234E were not enabled in Section 200A prior to June 1, 2015. Therefore, late fees could not be imposed for TDS statements filed before this date.
The Tribunal held that the provisions for levying late fees under Section 234E were not enabled in Section 200A prior to June 1, 2015. Therefore, late fees could not be imposed for TDS statements filed before this date.
The Tribunal held that the provisions for levying late fees under Section 234E were not enabled in Section 200A prior to June 1, 2015. Therefore, late fees could not be imposed for TDS statements filed before this date.
The Tribunal held that the provisions for levying late fees under Section 234E were not enabled in Section 200A prior to June 1, 2015. Therefore, late fees could not be imposed for TDS statements filed before this date.
The Tribunal held that the provisions for levying late fees under Section 234E were not enabled in Section 200A prior to June 1, 2015. Therefore, late fees could not be imposed for TDS statements filed before this date.
The Tribunal held that the provisions for levying late fees under Section 234E were not enabled in Section 200A prior to June 1, 2015. Therefore, late fees could not be imposed for TDS statements filed before this date.