68 tribunal orders from the Agra bench in 2022.
Showing 40 of 68 orders. Use the months below for the rest.
The Tribunal held that the PCIT's assumption of jurisdiction under Section 263 was bad in law. It found that the Assessing Officer had made inquiries and that the issue of closing stock was already under appeal before the CIT(A), barring revisionary powers.
The Tribunal held that the PCIT's assumption of jurisdiction under Section 263 was bad in law. It found that the Assessing Officer had made inquiries and that the issue of closing stock was already under appeal before the CIT(A), barring revisionary powers.
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A), citing a justice-oriented approach and lack of malafide intention. The Tribunal then adjudicated the appeals on merits, finding that late fees under Section 234E could not be levied for TDS statements filed before the insertion of the enabling clause in Section 200A.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The disallowance by the AO was not justified.
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A), citing a justice-oriented approach and lack of malafide intention. The Tribunal then adjudicated the appeals on merits, finding that late fees under Section 234E could not be levied for TDS statements filed before the insertion of the enabling clause in Section 200A.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The disallowance by the AO was not justified.
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A), citing a justice-oriented approach and lack of malafide intention. The Tribunal then adjudicated the appeals on merits, finding that late fees under Section 234E could not be levied for TDS statements filed before the insertion of the enabling clause in Section 200A.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The disallowance by the AO was not justified.
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A), citing a justice-oriented approach and lack of malafide intention. The Tribunal then adjudicated the appeals on merits, finding that late fees under Section 234E could not be levied for TDS statements filed before the insertion of the enabling clause in Section 200A.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance is warranted for belated payment of employee's contribution to ESI and EPF funds if deposited before the due date of filing the Income Tax Return. The AO was not justified in denying the deduction.