DHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD.,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-29, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that for Section 14A, the availability of interest-free funds exceeding investments needs verification. Regarding Section 10AA, common expenses and interest allocation to the exempt unit require further examination by the AO.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in manufacturing chewing tobacco, filed its return declaring a loss. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions, and the Commissioner (Appeals) granted partial relief. The assessee appealed against these orders.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 14A is justified when interest-free funds exceed investments, and how common expenses and interest should be allocated to an exempt unit under Section 10AA.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Joint Investments Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT803 citing372 ITR 694 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- ACB India Ltd. v. ACIT364 citing374 ITR 108 · 2015 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘B’, NEW DELHI
Before: SH. ANIL CHATURVEDI & SH. NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Consolidated Appeals (3)
PER ANIL CHATURVEDI, AM :
These four appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the order dated 27.04.2018, 28.02.2018, 21.05.2019 & 21.12.2021 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 31, 30 New Delhi relating to Assessment Years 2013-14, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017- 18 respectively.
Since the issue in all the four appeals are common, therefore we have clubbed all the appeals together for the sake of brevity and convenience, however, we are taking ITA No.4300/Del/2018 for A.Y. 2013-14 as a lead case.
The relevant facts as
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026