THE BILASPUR NAGRIK SAHAKARI BANK LTD,BILASPUR(CG) vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE, 1(1)BILASPUR, BILASPUR(CG)
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the assessee had sufficient interest-free own funds to cover its investments in exempt income yielding assets, no disallowance under Section 14A was warranted. The disallowance of Rs. 3,99,790/- was vacated.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative bank, made investments yielding exempt income. The Assessing Officer disallowed expenditure attributable to this income under Section 14A. The CIT(Appeals) confirmed this disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 14A is justified when the assessee has sufficient interest-free funds to cover investments in exempt income yielding assets.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- South Indian Bank Ltd. v. CIT508 citing438 ITR 1 · 2021 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI RAVISH SOOD & SHRI JAMLAPPA D BATTULL
आदेशक���त�ल�पअ�े�षत / Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant. 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent.
3. The CIT(Appeals), Bilaspur (C.G) 4. The Pr. CIT, Bilaspur (C.G) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध,आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण,रायपुर ब�च, रायपुर / DR, ITAT, Raipur Bench, Raipur. गाड�फ़ाइल / Guard File. 6. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, // True Copy // �नजीस�चव / Private Secretary आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, रायपुर / ITAT, Raipur.
9 Bilaspur Nagrik Sahakari Bank Ltd. Vs. DCIT ITA No. 55/RPR/2017
Date 1 Draft dictated on 11.03.2022 Sr.PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 11.03.2022 Sr.PS/PS 3 Draft proposed and placed JM/AM before the second Member 4 Draft discussed/approved by AM/JM second Member 5 Approved draft comes to the Sr. Sr.PS/PS PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of order Sr.PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk Sr.PS/PS 9 Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the A.R 11 Date of dispatch of order
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026