SHRI SHEO BHAGWAN GOEL,RAIPUR (CG) vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF IMCOME TAX, RAIPUR (CG)
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the lower tax authorities made an arbitrary ad-hoc disallowance without specific findings or rationale. The disallowance was not justified as the assessee had provided supporting evidence and the revenue failed to prove the expenditure was not for business purposes.
What were the facts?
The assessee incurred increased freight charges for their steel business. The Assessing Officer made an ad-hoc disallowance of Rs. 1,70,000/- due to disproportionate increase and perceived issues with some vouchers, which was upheld by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether an ad-hoc disallowance of freight charges is justified without specific findings and rationale, and whether the onus was discharged by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Calcutta Agency Ltd.164 citing19 ITR 191 · 1951 · SC
- 30 to CIT v. Indian Molasses Co. (l) Ltd.39 citing78 ITR 474 · 1975 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI RAVISH SOOD & SHRI JAMLAPPA D. BATTULL
आदेश की प्रधिधलधप अग्रेधर्ि / Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. 1. अपीलार्थी / The Appellant. 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent.
3. The Pr. CIT-1, Raipur(C.G.) 4. The Pr. CIT, Raipur (C.G.) 5. दवभागीय प्रदतदनदि,आयकर अपीलीय न्यायादिकरण,रायपुर बेंच, रायपुर / DR, ITAT, Raipur Bench, Raipur. 6. गार्डफ़ाइल / Guard File. आिेशानुसार / BY ORDER, दनजीसदचव / Private Secretary
आयकरअपीलीयअदिकरण, रायपुर / ITAT, Raipur.
ITAT-Raipur Page 9 of 9
More judgments on Section 37(1)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Smit Navnitlal Soni, Ahmedabad, Gujarat vs ITO Ward-5(3)(1), Ahmedabad, GujaratITA 1434/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026