Section 44AA of the Income Tax Act
The decision most relied on for Section 44AA is Surajmal Parsuram Todi v. CIT (222 ITR 691), cited in 114 of the 195 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.
Leading authorities on Section 44AA
A penalty under Section 271B for failure to get accounts audited cannot be levied if a penalty under Section 271A has already been imposed for non-maintenance of books of account.
If a penalty is levied under Section 271A for failure to maintain books of account, then a separate penalty under Section 271B for failure to get accounts audited under Section 44AB cannot also be levied.
If an assessee has not maintained books of accounts, the question of getting those accounts audited under Section 44AB does not arise, and therefore, a penalty under Section 271B for failure to get accounts audited cannot be levied. Non-maintenance of books is separately punishable under Section 271A.
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) cannot send a matter back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment under Section 263(1) without first conducting an inquiry himself, especially if the basis for revision is the AO's alleged lack of inquiry. If the AO has made an inquiry and taken a plausible view, the PCIT must undertake fresh verification to demonstrate the AO's conclusion is erroneous and prejudicial.
An order that dismisses grounds of appeal based on a single issue, thereby disobeying the mandates of section 250(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is not a lawful adjudication and is irregular, making it a fit case for remand.
An appellate authority, including the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), must adjudicate appeals strictly within the confines of the law and cannot travel beyond its statutory provisions. Actions taken by an appellate authority exceeding its legal jurisdiction are void.
The department cannot improve upon the Assessing Officer's case by changing the basis of additions without issuing a show cause notice to the assessee.
When an assessee fails to maintain books of account, resulting in a confirmed penalty under section 271A, no additional penalty under section 271B can be levied for the failure to get accounts audited under section 44AB, as there are no accounts to audit.
The levy of penalty under Section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is discretionary and not mandatory, as indicated by the use of the word 'may' instead of 'shall' in sub-section (1).
Reassessment proceedings initiated for AY 2015-16 after April 1, 2021, are barred by limitation and invalid, as per the amended provisions of the Finance Act, 2020.
Judgments on Section 44AA
Showing 1–20 of 195 · Page 1 of 10