ACIT, CIRCLE-18(2), NOIDA vs. NOIDA TOLL BRIDGE CO. LTD., NOIDA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to record the assessee's failure to disclose material facts. It also held that agency fees incurred for ensuring compliance with loan agreements were revenue expenditure. Consequently, the assessee's appeals were allowed, and the Revenue's appeals were dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeals challenged the reopening of assessment, enhancement by the CIT(A), and the merits of additions. The Revenue's appeals challenged the deletion of additions by the CIT(A). The primary issue revolved around the validity of reassessment proceedings and the deductibility of agency fees.
What were the issues?
The key issues were the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated beyond four years without establishing assessee's failure to disclose material facts, and whether agency fees constituted a capital or revenue expenditure.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(24)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. ITO1,349 citing259 ITR 19 · 2003 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Kanpur Coal Syndicate359 citing53 ITR 225 · 1964 · SC · Read judgment
- M.M.Aqua Technologies Limited v. CIT308 citing436 ITR 582 · 2021 · SC · Read judgment
- Sedco Forex International Drill. Inc. v. CIT285 citing12 SCC 717 · 2005 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Shapoorji Pallonji Mistry278 citing44 ITR 891 · 1962 · SC · Read judgment
- Shyam Sunder v. Ram Kumar263 citing1 SCC 352 · 2001
- Shyam Sunder v. Ram Kumar, (2001) 8 SCC 24 (para 44); Brij Mohan Das Laxman Das v. CIT261 citing5 SCC 482 · 1997 · SC
- E.D. Sassoon & Co. Ltd. v. CIT256 citing26 ITR 27 · 1954 · SC · Read judgment
- Haryana Acrylic Manufacturing Company v. CIT248 citing308 ITR 38 · 2009 · HC
- CIT v. Sardari Lal & Co.240 citing251 ITR 864 · 2001 · HC
- CIT v. Rai Bahadur Hardutroy Motilal Chamaria239 citing66 ITR 443 · 1967 · SC · Read judgment
- Reliance Jute and Industries Ltd. v. CIT214 citing1 SCC 139 · 1980 · Read judgment
- Sonia Bhatia v. State of U.P190 citing2 SCC 585 · 1981
- SedcoForexInternational Drill. Inc. v. CIT186 citing10 SCC 165 · 2000
- CIT v. S.G. Pgnatale181 citing124 ITR 391 · 1980 · HC
- Varghese v. ITO, Ernakulum164 citing4 SCC 173 · 1981
- CIT v. McMillan & Co.156 citing33 ITR 182 · 1958 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Nirbheram Daluram141 citing224 ITR 610 · 1997 · SC
- CIT v. Sam Global Securities Ltd.70 citing325 ITR 565 · 2010 · HC
- (i) Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. v. CIT43 citing63 DTR 212 · 2011 · HC
- Narrondas Manordass v. Commissioner of Income-tax40 citing31 ITR 909 · 1957 · HC
- CIT v. Gujarat Guardian Ltd.25 citing222 CTR 526 · 2009 · HC · Read judgment
- South Eastern Coal Fields Ltd. v. JCIT Nagpur14 citing85 ITD 608 · ITAT
- 89 ITD 6626 citing89 ITD 662 · ITAT
Heard together (20 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI ‘E’ BENCH, NEW DELHI
BEFORE SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER, AND MS. ASTHA CHANDRA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
SA No. 564/DEL/2018 [A/o ITA No.4410/DEL/2018 [A.Y. 2006-07]] SA No. 565/DEL/2018 [A/o ITA No.4411/DEL/2018 [A.Y. 2007-08]] SA No. 566/DEL/2018 [A/o ITA No.4412/DEL/2018 [A.Y. 2008-09]] SA No. 567/DEL/2018 [A/o ITA No.4413/DEL/2018 [A.Y. 2009-10]] SA No. 568/DEL/2018 [A/o ITA No.4415/DEL/2018 [A.Y. 2010-11]] SA No. 569/DEL/2018 [A/o ITA No.4417/DEL/2018 [A.Y. 2011-12]] & ITA No.4410/DEL/2018 [A.Y. 2006-07] ITA No.4411/DEL/2018 [A.Y. 2007-08] ITA No.4412/DEL/2018 [A.Y. 2008-09] ITA No.4413/DEL/2018 [A.Y. 2009-10] ITA No.4414/DEL/2018 [A.Y. 2010-11] ITA No.4415/DEL/2018 [A.Y. 2010-11] ITA No.4416/DEL/2018 [A.Y. 2011-12] ITA No.4417/DEL/2018 [A.Y. 2011-12] Circle – 18(2), Noida Noida
PAN : AAACN 3498 A ITA No. 4968/DEL/2018 [A.Y. 2006-07] ITA No. 4969/DEL/2018 [A.Y. 2007-08] ITA No. 4970/DEL/2018 [A.Y. 2008-09] ITA No. 4973/DEL/2018 [A.Y. 2009-10] ITA No. 4971/DEL/2018 [A.Y. 2010-11] ITA No. 4972/DEL/2018 [A.Y. 2011-12]
The A.C.I.T Vs. Noida Toll Bridge Co.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026