DCIT, CIRCLE- 1(1), GURGAON vs. CINEPOLIS INDIA PVT. LTD. (SUCCESSOR TO FUN MULTIPLEX PVT. LTD.), GURGAON

ITA 4021/DEL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 August 2023AY 2014-15Bench: SHRI KUL BHARAT (Judicial Member), DR. B.R.R. KUMAR (Accountant Member)13 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the entertainment tax subsidy is a capital receipt, aligning with previous ITAT and Supreme Court decisions. The Tribunal also affirmed the CIT(A)'s decision regarding the service tax provision and dismissed the assessee's cross-objection regarding the assessment on a non-existent company.

What were the facts?

The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order which treated entertainment tax subsidy as capital in nature and allowed depreciation. The assessee filed a cross-objection challenging the assessment order passed in the name of a dissolved entity.

What were the issues?

The primary issues were the taxability of entertainment tax subsidy and the allowability of service tax provision as a deduction. A secondary issue was the validity of an assessment order passed for a dissolved entity.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 115JB

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(5)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “F”: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT & DR. B.R.R. KUMAR

For Appellant: Ms. Hasneeta Matta, Adv
Hearing: 03.08.2023Pronounced: 30.08.2023

Heard together (2 matters)

ITA No. 4021/Del/2018
CO No. 152/Del/2018

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

PER KUL BHARAT, JM:

The captioned appeal by the Revenue and the Cross-objection by the assessee, are directed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax

(Appeals)-4, Mumbai, dated 30.01.2018, pertaining to the assessment year 2014-

15.

Both the matters were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience.

2.

The Revenue

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 115JB

All 5,494 judgments and leading authorities on Section 115JB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →