ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), NAGPUR vs. M/S R.B. SETH SHREERAM NARSINGDAS, NAGPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 35/NAG/2018Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur31 July 2023AY 2013-2014Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI (Judicial Member)3 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal as not maintainable due to low tax effect, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019. Consequently, the assessee's cross-objection was also dismissed as infructuous.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A) for AY 2013-14. The assessee also filed a cross-objection. The tax effect in the Revenue's appeal was below the threshold stipulated by CBDT Circular No. 17/2019.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable before the ITAT when the tax effect is below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 268A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR – VIRTUAL COURT

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI

For Appellant: Shri Sudesh Bandhia
For Respondent: Smt. Rashmi Mathur, Shri Sudesh Bandhia
Hearing: 20.07.2023Pronounced: 31.07.2023

Heard together (2 matters)

ITA No.35/NAG/2018
C.O. No.04/NAG/2018

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

ORDER

PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM:

1.

This is an appeal filed by the Revenue directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Nagpur [‘the CIT(A)’] dated 28.12.2017 for the assessment year 2013-14. The 2 C.O. No.04/NAG/2018 Cross Objection filed by the assessee against the appeal of the Revenue. ITA No.35/NAG/2018 – By Revenue : 2. It is stated before us that the tax effect in the present appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs and therefore, the Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in exercise of its power vested under Sec.268A(1) of the IT Act comes into play wherein, the monetary limit for filing the appeal by the Revenue before the ITAT and various High Courts as well as Apex Court are revised with an object of reducing the tax litigation. Vide para 3 of the said circular (supra) it is stated that in cases where the tax effect in the appeals to be filed before the Appellate Tribunal does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs appeals should not be filed. Thus, taking a note of CBDT Circular No.17/2019, dated 08.08.2019 and considering the fact that the tax effect in the instant appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs, the present appeal deserves to be dismissed as not pressed / not maintainable. However, we make it clear that the issues raised in the instant appeal are left open to be examined in the appropriate proceedings, if arises, in future. At the same time, we also make it clear that if the appeal falls in any of the exceptions referred to in the above said CBDT Circular, the Revenue is at liberty to move an application for recalling the order if so advised.

More judgments on Section 268A

All 3,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 268A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →