DY. CIT-4(1), INDORE, INDORE vs. KIRAN BAJPAI, INDORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the tax effect in the present appeal was below the revised monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue was not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against an order passed under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee's counsel drew attention to a CBDT circular revising the monetary limit for filing appeals before the tribunal to Rs. 60 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable given the revised monetary limits for filing appeals as per the CBDT circular.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, इंदौर "यायपीठ, इंदौर "ी परेश एम. जोशी, "या"यक सद"य तथा "ी अर"वंद सोनी, लेखा सद"य के सम" आ.अ.सं. 426/इंदौर/2026 "नधा"रण वष" : 2024-25 आयकर उपायु"त बनाम "करण बाजपाई, 4(1), इंदौर 106, सांई कृपा कॉलोनी, बॉ"बे हॉ"पीटल के सामने, इंदौर अपीलाथ" ""यथ" "था.ले.सं.- एईसीपीबी 0669 एन PAN- AECPB0669N राज"व क" ओर से "ी "बनय कुमार राय, व"र"ठ "वभागीय ""त"न"ध "नधा"रती क" ओर से "ी सुभाष चंद जैन, सीए सुनवाई "त"थ 03.09.2026 उ"घोषणा "त"थ 09.09.2026 आदेश "ी परेश म.जोशी, "या"यक सद"य "वारा "नधा"रण वष" 2024-25 से संबं"धत राज"व "वारा दा"खल यह अपील "व"वान अ"त"र"त /संयु"त आयकर आयु"त (अपील)-11, मुंबई के आदेश "दनांक 16.01.2026 के "व""ध "नदे"शत ह", जो सीपीसी, ब"गलु" "वारा आयकर अ"ध"नयम, 1961 क" धारा 154 के अधीन आदेश "दनांक 21.12.2024 से उ"भूत है ।
सुनवाई के दौरान, "नधा"रती के "व"वान अ"धव"ता ने हमारा "यान क"""य ""य" कर बोड" "वारा जार" नवीनतम प"रप" सं. 9/2024 "दनांक 17.09.2024 क" ओर आक"ष"त "कया िजसके "वारा "वभाग "वारा अ"धकरण के सम" अपील दा"खल करने हेतु अंत""त "व"न"हत कर सीमा को संशो"धत कर 60 लाख "कया गया है । साथ ह" उपरो"त प"रप" के प"र"छेद सं. 4 के
आ.अ.सं. 426/इंदौर/2026 2 "करण वाजपेई, इंदौर अनुसार आयकर अ"ध"नयम क" धारा 268 ए के अधीन द" गई शि"तय" के अनुपालन म" अ"धकरण के सम" "वभाग "वारा कोई
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026