JASMINA TRUST,NEW DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that the assessee, being a charitable trust operating as an Association of Persons, is not subject to the maximum marginal rate (MMR) or the surcharge of 37%. The tax should be computed at the normal slab rates applicable to an AOP.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Jasmina Trust, filed its returns which were processed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act. The AO levied tax at a flat rate of 30% and a surcharge of 37%, denying the refund claimed by the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee, a charitable trust registered under the Charitable and Religious Trust Act, 1920 and operating as an AOP, is liable to be taxed at the maximum marginal rate and at a surcharge of 37% when its income is not indeterminate or unknown?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(1),Section 234C,Section 11,Section 167B,Section 167A,Section 10(25),Section 164(1)(iv),Section 12AA,Section 143(1)(a)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES: A : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN & SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM: These are appeals preferred by the assessee against the orders dated 10.03.2025, 10.03.2025 and 11.03.2025 of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-1, Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as the ld. First Appellate Authority or ‘the Ld. FAA’ for short) in Appeals No.NFAC/2020-21/10187137, No.Addl./JCIT(A)-1, Kolkata/10008/2021-22 and Addl./JCIT(A)-1, Kolkata/10043/2022-23 arising out of the appeals before it against the intimation dated 13.10.2022, 15.06.2023 and 14.02.2024 u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’) by the CPC, Bengaluru (hereinafter referred to as th
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 234C
- Vikas Ashokkumar Masand, Ahmedabad vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3130/AHD/2026[A.Y. 2017-18]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Sarvjeet Singh Through Legal Heir Manjit… vs ITO Ward 1(1), AlwarITA 355/JPR/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026