ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NEW DELHI vs. SAHARA PRIME CITY LTD., LUCKNOW
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)'s orders, finding that the expenses were either properly vouched business expenditures or that the CIT(A)'s deletion of disallowances in prior years was consistently applied. No distinguishing facts were presented by the Revenue.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s orders deleting various additions made by the Assessing Officer. These additions pertained to disallowances under Section 14A, commission payments, interest expenses, and excess depreciation.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in deleting additions related to disallowances under Section 14A, commission payments, interest expenses, and excess depreciation, and whether prior year's decisions were applicable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Cheminvest Ltd. v. CIT1,569 citing378 ITR 33 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Holcim India (P.) Ltd.138 citing57 Taxmann.com 28 · 2015 · HC
- CIT v. BSES Yamuna Power Ltd.105 citing358 ITR 47 · 2013 · HC
- CIT v. Orient Ceramic & Industries Ltd.27 citing358 ITR 49 · 2013 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “A”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT & SHRI M. BALAGANESH
PER BENCH:
The captioned appeals, by the Revenue, in respect of the very same assessee,
are directed against separate orders dated 14.09.2023 for A.Y. 2009-10;
2023 for A.Y. 2010-11; 28.03.2016 for A.Y. 2011-12; dated 18.08.2016 for 2 ITA Nos. 6242/Del/2013 & ors. A.Y. 2012-13; dated 06.09.2016 for A.Y. 2013-14; 21.06.2017 for A.Y. 2014-15;
2018 for A.Y. 2015-16; and 31.05.2019 for A.Y. 2016-17 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-23, New Delhi. All these appeals
were heard together and are bein
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026