DY. CIT CENTRAL CIRCLE -1(2), NAGPUR vs. SHRI AMIT BHAURAO JICHKAR, NAGPUR
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, citing CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 which mandates that appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 50 lakhs should not be filed. The penalty appeal was deemed infructuous as a result.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals before the ITAT against the orders of the CIT(A) for assessment year 2012-13. The tax effect in one of the appeals was less than Rs. 50 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Maintainability of appeals before the ITAT based on the tax effect and the impact of CBDT circulars on litigation limits. The consequence of a low tax effect on penalty proceedings was also considered.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR – VIRTUAL COURT
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI
ORDER PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM: These are the appeals filed by the Revenue. The appeal in is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 1, Nagpur [‘the CIT(A)’] dated 16.04.2019 and the appeal in is 2 ITA Nos.151 & 167/NAG/2019 directed the order of ld. CIT(A) dated 29.05.2019 for assessment year 2012-13 respectively. ITA No.151/NAG/2019 : 2. It is stated before us that the tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs and therefore, the Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in exercise of its power vested under Sec.268A(1) of the IT Act comes into play wherein, the monetary limit for filing the appeal by the Revenue before the ITAT and various High Courts as well as Apex Court are revised with an object of reducing the tax litigation. Vide para 3 of the said circular (supra) it is stated that in cases where the tax effect in the appeals to be filed before the Appellate Tribunal does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs appeals should not be filed. Thus, taking a note of CBDT Circular No.17/2019, dated 08.08.2019 and considering the fact that the tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs, this appeal deserves to be dismissed as not pressed / not maintainable. However, we make it clear that the issues raised in this appeal are left open to be examined in the appropriate proceedings, if arises, in future. At the same time, we also make it clear that if this appeal falls in any of the exceptions referred to in 3 ITA Nos.151 & 167/NAG/2019 the above said CBDT Circular, the Revenue is at liberty to move an application for recalling the order if so advised. Accordingly, in the light of CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 08/08/2019, this appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No.151/NAG/2019 stands dismissed.
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026