C & C CONSTRUCTIONS LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CC-19, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that due to the moratorium under the IBC and the overriding effect of Section 238 of the IBC, the appeal could not be pursued. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed without going into the merits of the case.
What were the facts?
The assessee company is undergoing proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, and a moratorium has been granted by the NCLT. This moratorium statutorily prohibits the continuation of pending suits or proceedings against the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether proceedings before the ITAT can continue against a company under moratorium as per the IBC, 2016.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Pr. CIT v. Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd.34 citing107 Taxmann.com 481 · 2019 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘I’, NEW DELHI
ORDER PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, AM :
The captioned appeal has been filed by the assessee is challenging the final assessment order passed under section 144 read with section 144C(13) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 pertaining to Assessment Year 2017-18, in pursuance to the directions of learned Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP).
On perusal of case records, it is seen that proceedings under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) are going on against the assessee before National Company Law Tribunal New Delhi and moratorium as per the provisions of Section 14 of the IBC has been granted. A copy of the order of NCLT granting moratorium dated 14.02.2019 pursuant to proceedings initiated under IBC Code 2016 is placed on record. In terms of the M/s. C & C Construction Ltd. vs DCIT order of the NCLT, moratorium under Section 14 of IBC 2016 shall have statutory effect. In consequence of such moratorium, pending suits or proceedings against the assessee company including execution of any judgment, decree or order in any Court of law, Tribunal, arbitration penal or other authority, etc. is statutorily prohibited.
In the light of statutory provision and in the light of decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Pr. CIT Vs. Monnet Ispat and Energy Limited (2019) 107 taxmann.com 481 and also in the light of the overriding provision of the code in terms of Section 238 of the Act, the assessee is estopped to pursue the captioned appeal and present proceedings before Tribunal cannot continue.
That being the position, no useful purpose is going to be served in continuing the present proceedings. Therefore, this appeal needs to be consigned to the records.
For such reasons, without going to the merits of case, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed summarily with a liberty to the assessee to seek remedial measures in accordance with law as and when the moratorium period is over or order of the NCLT is modified or revival of the assessee company takes place or where it is necessary to do so in the interest of the parties.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed in limine for statistical purposes. Order was pronounced in the open court on 09.11.2023
More judgments on Section 14
- Infra Developers, Shivpuri vs Income Tax Officer, AshoknagarITA 454/AGR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shri Jayantibhai Virjibhai Babariya, SuratWTA 2/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shri Jayantibhai Virjibhai Babariya, SuratWTA 1/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Narayan Industries Global Limited, New Delhi vs DCIT Circle 16(1), DelhiITA 8422/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Manpreet Estates LLP, Mumbai vs ACIT, Central Circle 8(3), MumbaiITA 4386/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026