DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GANDHINAGAR vs. GUJARAT STATE PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED, GANDHINAGAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessment was invalid as it was based on a change of opinion without any fresh material. The Tribunal followed various High Court judgments stating that reopening is impermissible in such circumstances.
What were the facts?
The assessee's assessments were reopened to disallow expenses under Section 14A. The original assessments had already considered and partly disallowed such expenses. The assessee argued that the reopening was based on a change of opinion and lacked fresh material.
What were the issues?
Whether reopening of assessment under Section 147 is valid when it is based on a change of opinion and not on any fresh material? Whether disallowance under Section 14A can be made when the issue was already considered in original assessment and is subject matter of appeal?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(7)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- 414 and PCIT v. Gujarat Fluro Chemicals Ltd.21 citing155 Taxmann.com 135 · 2023 · HC
- Gujarat Enviro Protection & Infrastructure Ltd. v. DCIT11 citing91 Taxmann.com 436 · 2018 · HC
- Metro Auto Corporation v. ITO11 citing286 ITR 618 · 2006 · HC
- (i) Kanak Fabrics v. ITO9 citing49 Taxmann.com 108 · 2014 · HC
- Metro Auto Corporation v. ITO6 citing131 ITD 471 · 2011 · ITAT
- 355 and Checkmate Services (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT4 citing176 Taxmann.com 414 · 2025
- Gujarat Gas Ltd. v. DCIT4 citing168 Taxmann.com 355 · 2024
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “C” BENCH
Before: DR. BRR Kumar & Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar
PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
These cross appeals are filed by the Assessee and Revenue as against separate appellate orders both dated 28-03-2025 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, (in short referred to as “CIT(A)”), arising out of the 2 ITA Nos. 1165 & 1166/Ahd/2025 & ITA Nos.1254 & 1249/Ahd/2025 Gujarat
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026