SHRI SHIVASHANKAR URBAN CO-OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,GOKAK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, GOKAK
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal upheld the NFAC's decision, stating that the assessee could not make further claims during appellate proceedings that were not raised before the AO during the rectification proceedings. The grounds of appeal were dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative society, had interest income from bank deposits. The AO disallowed deduction under Section 80P for this income. Subsequently, the AO allowed proportionate expenses against this income through a rectification order.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can raise new claims during appellate proceedings after the AO has passed a rectification order. The eligibility of interest income for deduction under Section 80P.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PANAJI BENCH :: PANAJI
Before: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY & SHRI G.D. PADMAHSHALI
S.A.No. 06/PAN/2023 And (A.Y. 2018-19) Shri Shivashankar Urban Vs ITO, Ward-1, Co-operative Credit Society Gokak. Ltd., A/P Khanagaon, Tq. Gokak, Dist. Belagavi. PAN: AAAAS 7264 D Appellant Respondent Assessee by : Shri Saidappa Gadadi, CA Revenue by : Shri N. Shrikanth, DR Date of hearing : 14/08/2023 Date of pronouncement : 21/08/2023 O R D E R Per PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM:
The stay application and the appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre [NFAC], Delhi, dated 21.02.2023 for A.Y.2018-19 as per the grounds of appeal on record.
At the time of hearing, ld.AR submits that he wants to withdraw the stay application. Ld.DR has not raised any objection. Therefore, the stay application filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
SA No. 06/PAN/2023 & Shri Shivashankar Urban Co-op. Cr. Society Ltd. 3. Now we shall adjudicate the appeal filed by the assessee.
Brief facts of the case are that assessee is a co-operative society, filed its return of income for the A.Y. 2018-19. The assessment order u/sec. 143(3) r.w.s. 143(3A) & 143(3B) was passed on 15/03/2021 by treating the sum of Rs. 40,31,848/- representing interest received on bank deposits as not eligible for claim of deduction u/sec. 80P. Against the assessment order, the assessee filed application for rectification and requested for allowing deduction of proportionate expenses against such income which was treated as ineligible for claim of deduction u/sec. 80P. The AO accepted the contention of the assessee and accordingly proportionate deduction by way of expenses for earning income was worked out. Aggrieved by the order of the AO, assessee filed the appeal before the NFAC. The NFAC while adjudicating the appeal has observed that assessee had made a request for rectification stating that they had during the course of assessment proceedings, made a request for allowing deduction of proportionate expenses against such income which was to be treated as ineligible for claim of deduction u/sec. 80P. NFAC held that the AO had already allowed deduction u/sec. 80P for proportionate expenses as per the order u/sec. 154 of the Act. NFAC further held that assessee cannot make any further claim during the appellate proceeding which was not raised before the AO during the proceedings u/sec. 154 of the Act. Therefore, NFAC dismissed the appeal of the SA No. 06/PAN/2023 & Shri Shivashankar Urban Co-op. Cr. Society Ltd. assessee. We do not find any infirmity with the findings of the NFAC, which is hereby upheld and the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are dismissed.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026