SHRI SHIVASHANKAR URBAN CO-OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,GOKAK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, GOKAK

PDF · subscribers
ITA 77/PAN/2023Status: DisposedITAT Panaji21 August 2023AY 2018-19Bench: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY (Judicial Member), SHRI G.D. PADMAHSHALI (Accountant Member)3 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal upheld the NFAC's decision, stating that the assessee could not make further claims during appellate proceedings that were not raised before the AO during the rectification proceedings. The grounds of appeal were dismissed.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a co-operative society, had interest income from bank deposits. The AO disallowed deduction under Section 80P for this income. Subsequently, the AO allowed proportionate expenses against this income through a rectification order.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee can raise new claims during appellate proceedings after the AO has passed a rectification order. The eligibility of interest income for deduction under Section 80P.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80P,Section 154

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PANAJI BENCH :: PANAJI

Before: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY & SHRI G.D. PADMAHSHALI

For Appellant: Shri Saidappa Gadadi, CA
For Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth, DR
Hearing: 14/08/2023Pronounced: 21/08/2023

S.A.No. 06/PAN/2023 And (A.Y. 2018-19) Shri Shivashankar Urban Vs ITO, Ward-1, Co-operative Credit Society Gokak. Ltd., A/P Khanagaon, Tq. Gokak, Dist. Belagavi. PAN: AAAAS 7264 D Appellant Respondent Assessee by : Shri Saidappa Gadadi, CA Revenue by : Shri N. Shrikanth, DR Date of hearing : 14/08/2023 Date of pronouncement : 21/08/2023 O R D E R Per PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM:

The stay application and the appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre [NFAC], Delhi, dated 21.02.2023 for A.Y.2018-19 as per the grounds of appeal on record.

2.

At the time of hearing, ld.AR submits that he wants to withdraw the stay application. Ld.DR has not raised any objection. Therefore, the stay application filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

SA No. 06/PAN/2023 & Shri Shivashankar Urban Co-op. Cr. Society Ltd. 3. Now we shall adjudicate the appeal filed by the assessee.

4.

Brief facts of the case are that assessee is a co-operative society, filed its return of income for the A.Y. 2018-19. The assessment order u/sec. 143(3) r.w.s. 143(3A) & 143(3B) was passed on 15/03/2021 by treating the sum of Rs. 40,31,848/- representing interest received on bank deposits as not eligible for claim of deduction u/sec. 80P. Against the assessment order, the assessee filed application for rectification and requested for allowing deduction of proportionate expenses against such income which was treated as ineligible for claim of deduction u/sec. 80P. The AO accepted the contention of the assessee and accordingly proportionate deduction by way of expenses for earning income was worked out. Aggrieved by the order of the AO, assessee filed the appeal before the NFAC. The NFAC while adjudicating the appeal has observed that assessee had made a request for rectification stating that they had during the course of assessment proceedings, made a request for allowing deduction of proportionate expenses against such income which was to be treated as ineligible for claim of deduction u/sec. 80P. NFAC held that the AO had already allowed deduction u/sec. 80P for proportionate expenses as per the order u/sec. 154 of the Act. NFAC further held that assessee cannot make any further claim during the appellate proceeding which was not raised before the AO during the proceedings u/sec. 154 of the Act. Therefore, NFAC dismissed the appeal of the SA No. 06/PAN/2023 & Shri Shivashankar Urban Co-op. Cr. Society Ltd. assessee. We do not find any infirmity with the findings of the NFAC, which is hereby upheld and the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are dismissed.

More judgments on Section 80P

All 5,069 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80P →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →