DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI, LUCKNOW vs. M/S. U.P.POWER CORPORATION LTD., LUCKNOW
What did the Tribunal hold?
Both parties confirmed that the Tribunal had already passed an order on June 13, 2018, in consequence of a High Court order. Therefore, no further action was required by the Tribunal at this juncture.
What were the facts?
The assessee and Revenue filed cross-appeals. The Tribunal had previously disposed of these appeals, but the High Court remitted the issue of disallowance under Section 14A back to the Tribunal for fresh decision.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the disallowance of expenses under Section 14A, which was remitted back to the Tribunal by the High Court.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘A’, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA & SHRI SUBHASH MALGURIA
(A) These cross appeals were filed by the assessee as well as by Revenue against the order of learned CIT(A) dated 07/01/2013. These appeals were earlier disposed of by Tribunal vide order dated 13/06/2018 and the assessee carried the matter to Hon'ble Allahabad High Court and Hon'ble Allahabad High Court remitted back the issue to the Tribunal for deciding afresh the issue of disallowance u/s 14A of the I.T. Act. For the sake convenience, these two matters, listed before us by the registry on 06/08/2024 are disposed of through this consolidated order.
& 135/Lkw/2013 Assessment Year:2008-09 2 (B) In this case a letter dated 03/08/2024 was filed from the assessee’s side stating that the appeals have already been decided by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Lucknow Bench ‘A’ vide order dated 13/06/2018. It was further submitted that the aforesaid order dated 13/06/2018 was passed in consequence of order dated 08/03/2017 of Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in of 2015 and of 2015 dated 08/03/2017. Copies of the aforesaid orders have also been filed by the learned Authorised Representative for the assessee.
(C) Learned CIT (D.R.) for Revenue also confirmed that the aforesaid order dated 13/06/2018 was passed by ITAT and was part of the assessment record. Representatives of both sides concurred at the time of hearing before us, that order having already been passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in consequence of order of Hon'ble Allahabad High Court, there is no further action required by ITAT at the present juncture.
(D) In view of the foregoing, these matters are consigned to records and are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes. (Order pronounced in the open court on 08/08/2024)
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026