KARIKODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,THODUPUZHA vs. THE ITO WARD-1, THODUPUZHA, THODUPUZHA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 789/COCH/2022Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 March 2023AY 2011-2012Bench: Shri George George K. (Judicial Member), Ms. Padmavathy S. (Accountant Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessee claimed to have settled only the penalties under the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme, not the assessment itself. Therefore, the CIT(A) needed to examine this claim and decide the appeal on merits.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a Co-operative Society, filed a return of income claiming deduction under Section 80P. The assessment was completed disallowing this claim, and penalties were imposed. The assessee appealed to the CIT(A), which dismissed the appeal stating it was infructuous due to opting for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal as infructuous when the assessee claimed to have settled only penalties under the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme and not the main assessment.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80P,Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 250,Section 271B,Section 271F

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN

Before: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Ms. Swathy S., Advocate
For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Hearing: 02.03.2023Pronounced: 03.03.2023

ORDER Per: George George K., J.M. This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order of the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi dated 26.05.2022 passed under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). The relevant assessment year is 2011-12.

2.

The brief facts of the case are as follows: - The assessee is a Co-operative Society registered under the Kerala Co- operative Societies Act, 1969. Pursuant to the notice issued under Section 148 of the Act the assessee filed return of income for AY 2011-12 on 28.04.2018 declaring total income at 'Nil' (after claiming deduction under Section 80P of the Act). The assessment under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act was 3 Karikode Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. completed vide order dated 19.12.2016 disallowing the claim for deduction under Section SOP of the Act. It is noted that penalty under Sections 271B and 271F of the Act was also imposed.

3.

Aggrieved-by the reassessment completed under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act, the assessee preferred appeal before the first appellate authority. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee vide impugned order dated 26.05.2022 stating that the appeal has become infructuous since the assessee has settled the issue under Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme.

4.

Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A) the assessee has filed the present appeal before the Tribunal. The learned A.R. submitted that the CIT(A) has committed an error in dismissing the appeal of the assessee against the assessment order on a wrong belief that the assessee had opted for Vivad-se- Vishwas Scheme. It was submitted by the learned A.R. that the assessee had only opted for Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme for the penalty imposed and settled the matter. The learned A.R. submitted that the appeal may be restored to the file of the CIT(A) so that a decision shall be taken on merits.

5.

The learned D.R. was duly heard.

6.

We have heard the rival contentions and perused the material on record. It is claimed by the learned A.R. that the assessee had settled only penalties imposed under the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme and not for the assessment completed under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 147.of the Act. This claim of the assessee needs to be examined by the CIT(A) and for the aforesaid purpose the matter is restored to the file of the CIT(A) to take a decision in accordance with law. It is ordered accordingly.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 3rd of March, 2023.

More judgments on Section 80P

All 5,069 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80P →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →