HIMESH R. SHAH,JAMNAGAR. vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, JAMNAGAR.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee had reasonably demonstrated that investments earning exempt income were made from personal funds. This fact was also noted by the CIT(A) in a preceding year for identical investments. Therefore, the disallowance of expenses under Section 14A was not justified.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed disallowance of expenditure under Section 14A read with Rule 8D for earning exempt income. The assessee argued that investments earning exempt income were made from personal funds, not business funds, and therefore, interest expenses claimed in business were unrelated. The Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) disallowed the expenditure, stating the assessee failed to substantiate the source of funds and utilization of borrowed funds.
What were the issues?
Whether expenditure incurred for earning exempt income is disallowable when investments are made from personal funds and not business funds.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Gujarat Power Corporation Ltd.80 citing352 ITR 583 · 2013 · HC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: SMT.ANNAPURNA GUPTA & SHRI T.R.SENTHIL KUMAR
आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त ( अपील ) / The CIT(A)- 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध , आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण , राजोकट/DR,ITAT, Ahmedabad, 6. गाड� फाईल /Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,
सहायक पंजीकार (Asstt. Registrar) आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, ITAT, Ahmedabad
Date of dictation : 11-10-2022 2. Date on which the typed draft is placed before : the Dictating Member. 3. Date on which the approved draft comes to the : Sr.P.S./P.S 4. Date on which the fair order is placed before the : Dictating Member for pronouncement. 5. Date on which fair order placed before Other : Member 6. Date on which the fair order comes back to the : Sr.P.S./P.S. 7. Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk. : 19.10.2022 8. Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk. : 9. The date on which the file goes to the Assistant : Registrar for signature on the order. 10. Date of Despatch of the Order :
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026