NAIVEDHYAM BANQUETS AND FOODS PVT LTD,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTATN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC(TDS), GHAZIABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the AO had initiated proceedings under Section 201(1) and 201(1A) for non-deduction or non-payment of TDS. However, the AO failed to provide the assessees with an opportunity to be heard before passing the orders. The Tribunal found this to be a procedural lapse.
What were the facts?
The appeals were filed by various assessees against orders of the Assessing Officer (AO) concerning TDS compliance. The assessees are educational institutions, a pharmaceutical company, a banquet and food service provider, a projects company, and a school. The appeals relate to different assessment years and quarters.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the AO had followed the principles of natural justice by providing an opportunity of being heard to the assessees before passing orders under Section 201(1) and 201(1A) for TDS defaults.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
� ž�Ğ� Ž����� ������Ğ�� ��İ��� ������ ���� �� � , , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NAGPUR BENCH, PUNE (Through Virtual Hearing) BEFORE SHRI S. S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. D. PADMAHSHALI �� ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Asstt. Sr ITA No(s). Appellant Respondent Qtr. Form Yr. Archana Vidyaniketan ACIT, 2014-15 Q1 24Q Lakhpuri Murtizapur, CPC-TDS, 2014-15 Q2 24Q Dist �– Akola �– 444107 Ghaziabad 2014-15 Q3 24Q 60/NAG/2020 Maharashtra 2014-15 Q4 24Q 1-9 to PAN : AAETA9080E 2015-16 Q1 24Q 68/NAG/2020 2015-16 Q2 24Q 2015-16 Q3 24Q 2015-16 Q4 24Q 2016-17 Q1 24Q �0���V���0�D�\�R�Q�¶�V�� ACIT, 2013-14 Q2 26Q Pharmaceuticals Pvt. CPC-TDS, 2013-14 Q3 26Q 42/NAG/2020 Ltd. Ghaziabad 2013-14 Q4 26Q To Quaemi Baugh, Near 2014-15 Q1 26Q 10-15 47/NAG/2020 Itwari Railway Station, 2014-15 Q3 26Q Shanti Nagar, 2015-16 Q4 26Q Nagpur �– 440002 PAN: AAECM1515F Naivedhyam Banquets ACIT, 2015-16 Q2 24Q and Foods Pvt. Ltd. CPC-TDS, 2015-16 Q3 24Q House No.1252, Ghaziabad 2015-16 Q4 24Q 98/NAG/2020 Plot G & H, Ward 16-18 to No.22, Chikhli Layout, 100/NAG/2020 Bharat Nagar Square, Nagpur �– 440008 PAN: AAECN4420E M/s. Manasvi Projects ACIT, 2013-14 Q4 26Q Pvt. Ltd., CPC-TDS, 2014-15 Q4 24Q 21, Yashodham Ghaziabad 2013-14 Q4 24Q 416/NAG/2019 Shopping Center, 19-21 to Gen A K Vaidya Marg, 418/NAG/2019 Goregaon (E), Mumbai �– 400063 PAN: AABCM5230A Adilok Vidyalaya ITO TDS, 2014-15 Q4 24Q Bodunda Ward 2(4), 2015-16 Q4 26Q 35/NAG/2020 At Bodunda, Dist. Bhandara 22-23 & Gondia, 36/NAG/2020 Maharashtra �– 441801 TAN : NGPAO3076D ITAT - Pune Page 1 of 7
More judgments on Section 201
- Sbi, (Erstwhile Sbbj), Baran vs ITO (TDS), KotaITA 143/JPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Santosh Kumar Bhogi, Visakhapatnam vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 253/VIZ/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Raj Construction, Vadodara vs The ITO, Ward TDS-2, VadodaraITA 327/AHD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Himanshusinhji Jyotendrasinhji Jadeja… vs DCIT/ACIT Circle-1(1), RKT, RajkotITA 325/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Jagadish Panchal, Udaipur vs Additional Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 314/JODH/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026