CHALAKUDY MULTIPURPOSE CO-OP SOCIETY LTD NO. R 1213,CHALAKUDY vs. ITO WARD 2(1), THRISSUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1007/COCH/2022Status: HeardITAT Cochin11 October 2023AY 2019-20Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora (Accountant Member), Shri Manomohan Das (Judicial Member)3 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the adjustment made under Section 143(1)(a)(ii) for disallowing the deduction was not maintainable. Furthermore, the adjustment under Section 143(1)(a)(v) related to Section 80AC could not be applied prior to April 1, 2021.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a cooperative society, claimed a deduction under Section 80P. The deduction was denied and a demand was raised via an intimation under Section 143(1) because the return was filed beyond the due date, making the deduction impermissible under Section 80AC.

What were the issues?

Whether the disallowance of deduction under Section 80P made via an intimation under Section 143(1) is maintainable when the return was filed beyond the due date, considering the provisions of Section 80AC and the amendments to Section 143(1).

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80P,Section 80AC,Section 139(1),Section 143(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN

Before: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

For Appellant: Shri Amaljith, P.J., CA
For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Hearing: 11.10.2023Pronounced: 11.10.2023

O R D E R

Per Sanjay Arora, AM

1.

This is an Appeal by the Assessee directed against the Order dated 21.11.2022 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Income Tax Department, dismissing the assessee’s appeal contesting the denial of deduction under section 80P of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) on processing of it’s return of income for assessment year (AY) 2019-2020 vide Intimation u/s. 143(1) dated 04.01.2021.

2.

The denial of deduction u/s.80P in the instant case has been on account of application of s.80AC of the Act, which, with effect from 01.04.2018, bars the claim of deduction, inter alia, under any provision falling under Chapter VI-A (Part-C), where not made per a return filed within the time specified u/s.139(1). The return in the instant case has been admittedly filed on 30.9.2020, i.e., beyond the extended period of time allowed for filing the original return, i.e., 31.10.2019. The claim ITANo. 1007/Coch/ 2022 & SA No. 13/Coch/2023 Chalakudy Multipurpose Co-operative Society Ltd. vs. ITO u/s.80P, made at Rs.28,54,353, was accordingly disallowed vide Intimation u/s.143(1), raising a demand for Rs.12,15,705.

3.

The issue before us is the maintainability of the Revenue’s action in denying the assessee it’s claim for deduction u/s.80P on processing u/s. 143(1)(a). This Tribunal has, vide a detailed order in Kollad Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. & Ors. v. ITO(in dated 25.9.2023), found the adjustment u/s.143(1)(a)(ii), which has been applied in the instant case as well, as not maintainable, as indeed u/s. 143(1)(a)(v) where the same is prior to 01.04.2021, i.e., the date on which the corresponding amendment, i.e., with reference to sec.80AC, stands made in s.143(1)(a)(v). As explained therein, the adjustment is outside the scope of s. 143(1)(a)(ii), while that u/s. 143(1)(a)(v) could not be given effect to prior to 01/4/2021, as obtains in the instant case.

More judgments on Section 80P

All 5,069 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80P →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →