THE ITO(TDS)-3, JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR vs. SHRI PURANMAL JAMANLAL KABRA, JAMNAGAR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 107/RJT/2019Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot24 February 2023AY 2013-14Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member)3 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the Revenue's appeal was not maintainable due to low tax effect, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019. The appeal was dismissed on this ground.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A) for Assessment Year 2013-14. The appeal was filed after the issuance of CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, which restricts appeals where the tax effect is below Rs. 50 lakhs.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the maintainability of the Revenue's appeal before the ITAT in light of the CBDT's monetary limit for filing appeals.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 206C(6),Section 206C(7),Section 268A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT

Before: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Respondent: Shri B.D. Gupta, Sr. D.R

आदेश/ORDER PER : SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-

1.

This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2013-14, arises from order of the CIT(A), Jamnagar dated 19-02-2019, in proceedings under section 206C(6)/206C(7) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”.

Page No 2 ITO (TDS)-3 vs. Shri Puranmal Jamanlal Kabra

2.

At the outset, after going through the grounds of appeal and the impugned orders of the Revenue authorities below, a query was raised by the Bench as to applicability and maintainability of the appeal filed by the Revenue in view of recent CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8.8.2019 restricting the filling of the appeal by the Revenue where the tax effect is below Rs.50 lakhs, the ld. DR did not dispute the same and submitted that the issue is left to the Tribunal to be decided in accordance with law.

3. We find that the appeal of the Revenue is presented on 7.5.2019. On 8.8.2019 the CBDT has issued Instructions bearing No. 17 of 2019 prohibiting its subordinate authorities from filing of the appeal to the Tribunal against the order of the CIT(A) where the tax effect by virtue of the relief given by the CIT(A) is less than Rs.50 lakhs. The instructions have been made applicable with retrospective effect, meaning thereby, these instructions are applicable on pending appeals also. In the present case, “tax effect” on the total income assessed minus the tax that would have been chargeable had such total income been reduced by the amount of income in respect of the issue against which appeal is filed, is less than Rs.50 lakhs. Further, the case of the Revenue does not fall within the ambit of exceptions provided in the Circular. Thus, keeping in view the above CBDT circular and provisions of section 268A of the Income Tax Act, we are of the view that the present appeal of the Revenue deserves to be dismissed. It is accordingly dismissed.

However, it is observed that in case on re-verification at the end of the AO it comes to the notice that the tax effect is more or Revenue’s case falls Page No 3 ITO (TDS)-3 vs. Shri Puranmal Jamanlal Kabra within the ambit of exceptions provided in the Circular, then the Department will be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for recall of this order. Such application should be filed within the time period prescribed in the Act. In view of the above, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed due to low tax effect.

4.

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 24-02-2023

More judgments on Section 206C(6)

All 30 judgments and leading authorities on Section 206C(6) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →