M/S ANSHUL GOYAL LAND & HOUSING LTD.,LUDHIANA vs. DCIT, C-VII, LUDHIANA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal admitted the additional evidence related to Section 40A(3) and remanded the issue back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The addition under Section 14A was deleted due to the Assessing Officer's failure to record satisfaction and reliance on a superseded CBDT circular.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against the CIT(A)'s orders confirming additions made under Section 40A(3) and Section 14A. The assessee also sought to admit additional evidence before the CIT(A), which was refused.
What were the issues?
Whether additional evidence should be admitted for adjudication of Section 40A(3) additions and whether Section 14A disallowance was correctly made without proper satisfaction and in light of judicial pronouncements.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DIVISION BENCH’B’, CHANDIGARH
Before: SMT. DIVA SINGH & DR. B.R.R. KUMAR
PER BENCH:
Both the above appeals have been filed by the assessee against the separate order of the Ld. CIT(A)-4, Ludhiana.
Assessee has raised following grounds in ITA No. 1427/Chd/2017 for A.Y. 2010-11:
That the Ld. CIT(A)-4, Ludhiana has erred in passing the order u/s 250(6) of the Income tax Act, 1961. 2. That the Ld. CIT(A)-4, Ludhiana has also erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 9,30,000/- under the head “Payment made in contravention” made u/s 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 without any base and reasons thereof.
1 That the Ld. CIT(A) erred in law and facts in refusing to admit additional evidence u/s 46A of the I
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40A(3)
- Rekha Agarwal, Jaipur vs ITO WD 4(1), JaipurITA 844/JPR/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Infra Developers, Shivpuri vs Income Tax Officer, AshoknagarITA 454/AGR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Saiyed Zaharul Alam, Murshidabad vs I.T.O., Ward - 42(1), MurshidabadITA 2233/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- M/S Sadana Electric Store, Lucknow vs DCIT Range-6, LucknowITA 283/LKW/2024[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Nagendra Prasad, Patna vs ITO Ward -5(3) Patna, Dak BanglowITA 362/PAT/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026