VARIA ENGINEERING WORKS PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-4(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the Liquidator's submission that they lacked sufficient information to pursue the appeal. Given the company's liquidation status and the Revenue's no objection, the Tribunal allowed the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee company, Varia Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd., is under liquidation. The Liquidator filed a withdrawal application for the appeal due to lack of necessary details and documentary evidence to effectively represent the case. The Revenue had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn due to the company being in liquidation and the Liquidator's inability to present a comprehensive case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “D” BENCH
Before: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar
Assessment Year 2013-14 Varia Engineering Works The DCIT, Pvt. Ltd. Circle-4(1)(2), Plot No. 2005, Phase-IV, Vs Ahmedabad GIDC, Vatva, Ahmedabad-382445 (Respondent) PAN: AABCV0396G (Appellant) Assessee Represented: Ms. Dhwani Mehta, A.R. Revenue Represented: Shri Anurag Chandra, Sr.D.R. Date of hearing : 01-02-2024 Date of pronouncement : 02-02-2024 आदेश/ORDER PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
This appeal is filed by the Assessee as against the appellate order dated 27.02.2018 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-8, Ahmedabad arising out of the assessment order passed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year 2013-14.
Page No 2 Varia Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT
2. It is noted that the company is under Liquidation and the Liquidator Mr. Sunil Kumar Agarwal by its letter dated 23.01.2024 submitted as follows: Withdrawal Application Respected Sir.
We would like to submit as under:
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was initiated against Varia Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd (in Liquidation) (hereinafter referred to as "the assessee") by virtue of the NCLT order dated 21.12.2017 and the moratorium u/s 14 of the IBC code was imposed from same date. Upon finding no resolution of the assesse company, on 22.07.2019 the assesse company went into liquidation and undersigned was appointed Liquidator vide Hon'ble NCLT. Ahmedabad Order dated 07.08.2019 which has been intimated to Income Tax Department and in response to which a claim has been filed by the esteemed Income Tax Department on 27.09.2019 amounting to Rs. 88,48,11,650/- as under:
A.Y. Section Demand (Rs.) 2008-09 143(3) r.w.s. 147 3704040 2009-10 154 1064820 2010-11 143(3) r.w.s, 263 37718040 2010-11 271(1)(c) 3179530 2011-12 250 26592420 2011-12 271(1)(c) 22491478 2012-13 143(3) 2317920 2013-14 250 474372700 2015-16 143(3) 238609250 2015-16 271(1)(b) 20000 2016-17 143(3) 42324450 2016-17 271(1)(b) 30000 2016-17 271(1)(c) 32387002 Total 88,48,11.650/- Page No 3 Varia Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT
Income Tax Department being claimant was also part of the Stakeholder's Consultation Committee, letter for the intimation of the same was sent to the Income Tax Department along-with the progress in the matter. Further, every notice to attend the Consultation Committee Meetings has been sent to the Income Tax Department, however not a single meeting is attended.
It may kindly be noted that IBC provisions shall have overriding effect as per Section 238 of Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code which states as under: "The provisions of this Code shall have effect, notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or any instrument having effect by virtue of any such law." 4. In furtherance of the foregoing submission, we, humbly apprise this honourable court of the intricate circumstances surrounding the matter at hand. With specific regard to the additions made during the year under consideration, we regret to inform Your Honour that the appointed liquidator finds themselves in an exceedingly disadvantageous position. 5. It is essential to expound upon the complexities of the situation. The liquidator, through no fault of their own, is regrettably devoid of the comprehensive details and corroborating documentary evidence that would be indispensable for crafting a robust and legally sound representation of the case before this esteemed bench. Despite conscientious efforts to procure the requisite Information, the liquidator has encountered insurmountable obstacles and unanticipated barriers, which have impeded their ability to fulfill their fiduciary duties to the fullest extent. 6. In light of these multifaceted challenges and the profound limitations imposed upon the liquidator's ability to effectively advocate on behalf of the assessee, we find ourselves at a crossroads wherein the pursuit of justice and the principles of fairness necessitate a certain course of action. It is with the utmost reverence for the integrity of this court's proceedings that we now humbly beseech. Your Honour for the gracious concession of permission to voluntarily withdraw the pending appeal. 7. This request is made with the utmost sincerity and in full recognition of our duty to uphold the principles of justice and equity. The decision to seek withdrawal is not taken lightly: rather, it is a conscientious response to the present circumstances, which preclude the petitioner from offering a comprehensive and compelling presentation due to the inadequacy of available materials. We firmly believe that this course of action aligns with the broader interests of judicial efficiency and the unimpeachable pursuit of justice within the framework of the law.
Page No 4 Varia Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT
In view of the above detailed submission, your honour is requested to kindly allow us to withdraw the appeal.
Yours Truly Date: 23.01.2024 Place: Ahmedabad Sunil Kumar Agarwal (Liquidator) 3. Ld. Sr. D.R. appearing for the Revenue has no objection in withdrawing this appeal.
Recording the above letter, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby dismissed.
More judgments on Section 238
- DCIT221, Mumbai vs Nrc Limited, MumbaiITA 1333/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT221, Mumbai vs Nrc Limited, MumbaiITA 1332/MUM/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- DCIT221, Mumbai vs Nrc Ltd, MumbaiITA 1331/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Narayan Industries Global Limited, New Delhi vs DCIT Circle 16(1), DelhiITA 8422/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Ambassador Building Solutions Pvt Ltd, Delhi vs ITO Ward 14(2), New DelhiITA 1314/DEL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed14 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026