DASHA SHRIMALI BETAILS GNATI SURAKSHA SAMITI,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the DIT(E) did not consider all the objects and documents submitted by the assessee. Therefore, the matter was remanded back to the DIT(E) for proper adjudication after verifying all details.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Charitable Trust, applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The DIT(E) rejected the application for non-compliance with notices, despite the assessee claiming to have submitted relevant documents.
What were the issues?
Whether the DIT(E) erred in rejecting the registration application without considering all submitted documents and objects, and whether sufficient opportunity was provided to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT, Rajkot-II v. Leuva Patel Seva Samaj Trust8 citing42 Taxmann.com 181 · 2014 · HC
- State of Kerala v. M.P. Shanti Verma Jain8 citing248 ITR 587 · 2001
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal is filed by the assessee against order dated 27.07.2019 passed by the CIT (Exemption), Ahmedabad.
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal :-
1.1 The order passed u/s.12AA(1)(b)(iii) passed on 27.07.2019 by DIT(Exem), Ahmedabad declining to grant registration to the appellant Trust is wholly illegal, unlawful and against the principles of natural justice. 1.2 The Ld. DIT(Ex) has grievously erred in law and or on facts in passing the impugned order without giving sufficient opportunity to the appellant to produce necessary evidence in support of the application for registration u/s.12AA Page 2 of 4 2.1 The Ld. DIT(E) has grievously erred in law and on facts in rejecting the application for registration u/s.12AA filed by the appellant for want of compliance to the notice issued on 12.06.2019 though there was sufficient cause for failure to comply the same. 2.2 That in the facts and circumstances of the case as well as in law, the Ld. DIT(E) ought not have rejected the application for registration u/s.12AA filed by the appellant by invoking section 13(1)(b). 3.1 The Ld. DIT(E) has failed to appreciate that the activities of the appellant trust are genuine in nature and conducted in accordance with its objects of the trust.”
The assessee is a Charitable Trust and engaged in providing benefit called Vatsalya Nidhi Fund to the heirs of the deceased member. It is duly registered with Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 dated 02.11.2010. The Trust maintains the books of accounts and other records regularly and in accordance with the applicable laws. As stated by the Ld. AR, the assessee Trust is subjected to audit under the Trust Act and Income Tax Act. The assessee Trust filed application for registration of the Trust under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 17.01.2019. While processing the said application for registration, the DIT(E) issued first notice dated 12.04.2019 by e-mail. The assessee Trust could not file the reply to this notice on the fixed date in view of the e-mail notice not known to the assessee Trust but subsequently submitted the reply dated 24.04.2019 as part of compliance. Later on, the DIT(E) issued a fresh notice on 12.06.2019 calling for details listed at Sl. No.1 to 10 therein. The DIT(E) observed that the assessee failed to comply with the notice dated 12.06.2019 and in absence of any compliance or documentary evidence produced to prove the genuineness of the activities, the DIT(E) rejected the application for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act.
Being aggrieved by the Order under section 12AA(1)(b)(iii) of the Act passed by the CIT(E), the assessee preferred appeal before us.
The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee has submitted all the relevant documents including that of constitution of the assessee Trust and objects of the Trust as well as the list of Trustees with KYC documents, audit report with the audited annual account for the financial year 2015-16 to 2017-18. The Ld. AR submitted that the list of members of Gnati, Income Tax return with computation of income for assessment year 2016-17 and 2017-18 and also that of assessment Page 3 of 4 year 2019-20. The Ld. AR submitted that the CIT(E) without taking cognisance of the objects of the assessee Trust has simply rejected the application of the assessee Trust. The Ld. AR relied upon the decision of CIT vs. Leuva Patel Seva Sanaj Trust (2014) 42 taxmann.com 181 (Gujarat).
The Ld. DR submitted that since the assessee Trust has not given any details and the assessee Trust does not have intention even to start charitable/religious activities, therefore, the application was rightly rejected for registration under Section 12AA of the Act and also rejected the same by invoking provisions of Section 13(1)(b) of the Act. The Ld. DR relied upon the decision of the Tribunal in case of Amreli Modh Vanik Community Property vs. CIT (Exemption) (2023) 150 taxmann.com 179 (Rajkot Tribunal), Shri Gurudwara Sahib Parbhandhan Committee vs. CIT (Exemptions) (023) 150 taxmann.com 181 (Amritsar Tribunal), Ghulam Mohidin Trust vs. CIT (2001) 248 ITR 587 (J&K High Court) 7. We have heard both the parties and perused all the relevant material available on record. It is pertinent to note that the CIT(E) has not taken cognisance of the objects of the assessee Trust and has observed that the assessee has made only part compliance and, therefore, all the relevant documents has not been taken into consideration while rejecting the registration application under Section 12AA of the Act. Therefore, it will be appropriate to remand back this matter to the file of the CIT(E) for proper adjudication of the issues after verifying all the details/documents submitted by the assessee Trust and decide the case as per Income Tax Statute. Needless to say, the assessee be given opportunity of hearing by following the principles of natural justice. 8. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in the open Court on this 6th March, 2024.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026