SHRI R V SHAH CHARITABLE TRUST,BHAVNAGAR vs. THE DY.DIT, CPC, BENGALURU CURRENT JURISDICTION THE ITO, EXEMP., BHAVNAGAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that no exemption under Section 11 was claimed in the return, and the CPC's adjustment for non-furnishing of Form 10BB was valid. However, the exact reason for disallowing the claim in the intimation was unclear, and the Revenue was directed to provide it.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, claimed exemption under Section 10(23C) in its return, but the CPC disallowed it due to non-furnishing of Form 10BB. The assessee contended it inadvertently claimed the wrong section and was eligible for exemption under Section 11, for which Form 10B was filed.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in confirming the disallowance of exemption under Section 143(1) when the assessee claimed a different section inadvertently and sought to claim exemption under Section 11 during appellate proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 10(23C),Section 11,Section 143(1),Section 119,Section 154
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT1,842 citing284 ITR 323 · 2006 · SC
- S.R. Koshti v. CIT217 citing276 ITR 165 · 2005 · HC
- CIT v. Mitesh Impex125 citing398 ITR 514 · 2017 · HC
- Association of Indian Panelboard Manufacturer v. DCIT63 citing157 Taxmann.com 550 · 2023 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “ SMC ” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE & SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA
PER NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The present appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order u/s.250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) dated 19/01/2024 passed by the Addl./Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-8, Mumbai [“JCIT(A)” in short] for Assessment Year (AY) 2022-23. 2. The assessee is a Charitable Trust and filed its return of income for AY 2022-23 on 17/10/2022 declaring total income of Rs.1,48,175/-. The
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(23C)
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Gurukul Shiksha Sanstha, Chandrapur vs ITO Ward - 3, Exemp, NagpurITA 549/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Neuro Spinal Services and Research Society… vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemption…ITA 1601/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2025-26
- Samudayik Kendra Subhash Nagar Prabhand… vs Commissioner of Income Tax Exemption, JaipurITA 1440/JPR/2026[2027-28]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2027-28
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026