M/S. NORTH EASTERN ELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LTD.,SHILLONG vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - SHILLONG, SHILLONG
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer's view of treating LPS on a cash basis was permissible and not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue. The revisionary order under Section 263 was quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged a revisionary order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act and a subsequent CIT(A) order. The core issue was the treatment of Late Payment Surcharge (LPS) as accrued income versus cash basis.
What were the issues?
Whether the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax was justified in invoking Section 263 to revise the assessment order, and whether the treatment of Late Payment Surcharge on a cash basis was valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(22)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. v. CIT2,943 citing243 ITR 83 · 2000 · SC · Read judgment
- Radhasoami Satsang v. CIT1,695 citing193 ITR 321 · 1992 · SC
- CIT v. Max India Ltd.1,162 citing295 ITR 282 · 2007 · SC
- CIT v. Excel Industries Ltd.935 citing358 ITR 295 · 2013 · SC · Read judgment
- Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT621 citing227 ITR 172 · 1997 · SC
- Rampyari Devi Saraogi v. CIT616 citing67 ITR 84 · 1968 · SC
- ITO v. D.G. Housing Projects Ltd.438 citing343 ITR 329 · 2012 · HC
- CIT v. Vikas Polymers318 citing341 ITR 537 · 2012 · HC
- CIT v. Nirav Modi286 citing71 Taxmann.com 272 · 2017 · HC
- CIT v. Anil Kumar Sharma264 citing335 ITR 83 · 2011 · HC · Read judgment
- DIT (E) v. Apparel Export Promotion Council193 citing245 ITR 492 · 2000 · HC
- Radhasoami Satsang v. CIT168 citing244 ITR 734 · 2000 · HC
- Mrs. Khatiza S. Oomerbhoy v. ITO, Mumbai101 citing101 TTJ 1095 · 2006 · ITAT
- CIT v. Dinesh Kumar Goel87 citing331 ITR 10 · 2011 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Neo Polypack (P) Ltd.79 citing260 ITR 417 · 2006 · HC
- Parshuram Pottery Works Ltd. v. ITO73 citing264 ITR 276 · 2003 · HC
- Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. v. CIT65 citing268 ITR 128 · 2004 · HC
- CIT v. Realest Builders & Services Ltd.64 citing307 ITR 202 · 2008 · SC · Read judgment
- DIT v. Escorts Cardiac Diseases Hospital59 citing300 ITR 75 · 2008 · HC
- CIT v. Associated Food Products (P) Ltd.36 citing280 ITR 377 · 2006 · HC
- Mohan Ganeriwala: 260 ITR 417 (P&H) (11) Thirani Chemicals Ltd. v. DCIT9 citing70 ITD 200 · 1999 · ITAT
- R 734 (Del) (9) CIT v. Neo Poly Pack (P) Ltd. 245 ITR 492 (Del) (10) CIT v. Gilds'- Mohan Ganeriwala4 citing153 Taxmann 45 · 2006 · HC
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
ITA No. 45/GAU/2019 Assessment Year: 2014-2015 & Assessment Year:2014-2015 M/s. North Eastern Electric Power Corporation Limited IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA-GUWAHATI ‘e-COURT’, KOLKATA [Virtual Court Hearing]
Before Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-President (KZ) & Dr. Manish Borad, Accountant Member Assessment Year: 2014-2015
M/s. North Eastern Electric Power Corporation Limited,………………………………………………… Appellant Brookland Compound, Lower New Colony, Shillong-793003 [PAN:AAACN9991J]
-Vs.-
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,....Respondent Aayakar Bhawan, M.G. Road, Shillong, Meghalaya-793001
& Assessment Year: 2014-2015
M/s. North Eastern Electric Power Corporation Limited,…………………………………………………. Appellant Brookland Compound, Lower New Colony, Shillong-793003 [PAN:AAACN9991J]
-Vs.-
1 Assessment Year: 2014-2015 & Assessment Year:2014-2015 M/s. North Eastern Electric Power Corporation Limited Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,...Respondent Circle- Shillong, Aayakar Bhawan, M.G. Road, Shillong, Meghalaya-793001
Appearances by: Shri Ved Jain, A.R., appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri N.T. Sherpa, JCIT, appeared
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026